Well, it was D2, and there were 8 non-votes, on D3 there were just 2, one of whom did vote but it was not counted due to format. ToDay no-one is at risk of being mod-killed so I disagree with your take on things.
Not sure about doing it without qualms - they’ll need to have extra strong reasons to vote those players who were previously on their town leans list, and as the game progresses, while usually town would have better reads on people and therefore stronger leans, they should become more reserved and conservative - so it would be careless to go throwing names around early on, but heck, I’m not going to discourage it!
I was with you on SNF, just after you’d unvoted, as were Texcat and Koldanar.
What’s the slip? Garlic & waxing?
What does the “if needed” mean, do you find her more solidly scummy than Boozy? Or that you’re vote is fluid? Boozy, Diggit or Koldonar are fine.
It’s the words you used. Mislynch is a bad thing, so applying it lynching scum is strange. Lynching one type of scum being better than the other also struck me as strange when we need to remove them all to win.
The rest of your post then goes on to overturn that and says we should vote wolves - as if we were choosing not to:
- lynching wolves helps mafia
- it’s better if mafia try to kill wolves
- it’s better for us to try to lynch mafia
- eliminating wolves helps town (one less kill, mafia need to fake-hunt)
- it’s good to put pressure on wolves by voting them
- wolves will need to kill mafia to stay in the game
- mafia don’t need to focus on wolves
- if we keep pressure on wolves, they will take out mafia
- lynching mafia directly is better in the short term
- lynching wolves is bad in the short term but forces them to kill mafia
I agree that a lylo we would need to consider this and tread carefully, if we have that luxury.