Mafia Reunion Day 4

[paulwhoisaghost]

@Pleonast

I agree with this.
Yes. Which is why they should be claiming earlier rather than later. Or they risk being killed by Scum so they cannot verify each other–which means we’ll be forced to lynch them. And increasing our lynch burden that way makes it that much easier for Scum to win.
Being suspicious is a Towny tell. I tend to be more suspicious of players who are not suspicious of me.
Speak for yourself.
You know, this articulates something that was bothering me as well. Add to that paulwhoisaghost’s post D4.131, which feels like a “let’s you and them fight”, and I’m ready to vote.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

unvote
vote Prof. Pepperwinkle for explicitly advocating a pro-Scum tactic in D3.339.
vote paulwhoisaghost for scummy intentions in D4.20 and D4.131.
vote Boozahol Squid for advocating a deliberate mislynch in D3.499.
vote sinjin for smudging counter-claimable Town in D3.432.
vote Scathach for scolding a player for being too helpful to Town in D1.35.
vote Johnny Bravo for being too defensive and misrepresenting another’s case in D1.265.
vote Plumpudding for refusing to vote when called on it in D1.401.

While Prof Pepperwinkle is the most suspicious, note that I will move my vote to any of the above if it facilitates their lynch (either first or second).

Spoiler added by me to keep quote small.

I’m convinced the Pleo had results on Prof P and was trying to make it obvious on review. In Post #142 above, he unvotes Prof in order to vote for Prof. I thought it was odd at the time, like he had already forgotten who he voted or he unvoted just to add me to his list of suspects, but now I think it was him ensuring his message would get across.