It looks like it parses the first 200 posts. I believe Giraffe said he changed something in the page/thread settings to allow as much as was actually needed. the default setting of the script is whatever the default thread length was. Or some shit. I’m not sure.
Whoa… that’s is ALOT more switches than I think are in play…
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
I"m seriously looking askance at all of those so eager to lynch Crys toDay. You know who loves to see 3rd parties lynched? Scum! You know why? Because third parties typically count as town for scum win conditions. And this game is no different. Scum have to have numbers 50% or greater than the population on the whole and greater than the total number remaining of the other scum team.
Every lynch of a third party counts as a mislynch as far as the numbers are concerned. I would think in a game with this many veterans there’d be more people pointing this fact out.
While scum prefer to take out power roles, at the end of the Day cycle, a successful kill furthers their goal regardless of the faction killed (assuming it’s not one of them of course). But third parties, particularly hostile ones are an issue. So if they can get town to lynch them, they save themselves from being lynched and have one less non-scum that might take their win away. (Since town only wins by eliminating scum. Third parties win in other ways.)
So let’s do the scum job for them. Great idea! Even though scum lose nothing but a chance at hitting town power roles and/or confirmed town by taking out a third party. They don’t bring themselves directly closer to a loss. Unlike town. Who every time they lynch someone other than scum bring themselves one step closer to losing.
Let’s recap, shall we?
“Hi. I’m suspect of everyone, but I’m not going to vote. Even though I haven’t been all that active this game so far. So I can smudge two people without even committing to any real risk. And yesterDay my vote was basically a safe one-off. And now I suggest we all vote for two people, one of which I haven’t exactly explained what I find scummy, and one who seems not much of a threat on Day 2.”
“Hi. I’m putting this vote out here. For reasons.”
“Hi. I’m not actually reading the post of your role that clearly indicated that you and your cultists win if the game ends in “any way” and at least one of you are alive. I’m just going to jump on a not very well-thought out wagon and claim a bullshit reason for doing so. You know, if I actually thought you were lying about it, I might have a valid case here. But nothing in my post idicates this.”
“Hi. I’ve apparently never seen or been involved in games with third party cult/cabal types even though I’m far from a newbie at this whole mafia thing.”
“Hi. I believe that we should do scum’s job for them. Third parties with unforced claims that indicate no killing/blocking ability should be instantly lynched on the 2nd day of an almost 50-person game.”
“Hi. Where do I get a ticket for the lazy train!”
You know what? Out of all the votes so far, this one actually seems to be trying to make a real case. I disagree with it, but I won’t subject you to snark, because your post seem to take more than 30 seconds to compose.
“Hey, is there room for one more in your lazy train cabin?”
So there you have it. A bunch of people deciding to do scum’s job for them by piling on an easy lynch that has no real indication that it is any danger to Town at this point. Of course, if you are scum, and I’m pretty sure at least one of you is, you’re doing exactly what you should. Get town to lynch someone that isn’t part of your team.
One of you on this train is getting my vote.
[color=red]unvote jsgoddess
But who? You all deserve it. However, Klutz deserves it the least, since he seems to have actually put some thought into it. As far as to who deserves it the most, it’s a tossup between boozy, for not even voting, Hockey Monkey for not even reading the win condition but using a “you can steal our win” excuse to justify a badly placed vote, and Diggit, for this vote and his “well if they find enough they might have a power later, you know unlike scum who have powers now” post #606.
But in the end one person edges out the rest of you:
vote Hockey Monkey
Probably not. From the rules:
(bolding added)
I make it as
Brewha: 9
Crys: 8
ToeJam: raventhief[31-597], Idle[32], Sunny[34-318]
Idle: Angel[44-595]
Capt Klutz: Drain[45-132], Sunny[567-568], Crys[582]
Sario: ProfP[46], Cookies[523-575]
Angel: Zeriel[60-529], BoozySquid[80-556]
Texcat: PlumPudding[68]
ThingFish: Pleonast[121]
BillMc: Drain[132-638], Texcat[179-633]
Chronos: Nanook[151]
Meeko: JohnnyBravo[169]
Sachertorte: Meeko[203]
SNF: Diggit[250-588], Texcat[633-639]
Crys: Guiri[262], Sunny[568], Hockey[584], Diggit[588], Angel[595], Texcat[639], CaptKlutz[640], SNF[641]
Pleonast: Lightfoot[288], Hooker[295-621], ThingFish[297]
JSGoddess: HoopyFrood[294]
PlumPudding: Sunny[318-508]
Diggit: SNF[332-641], Paul[386]
Brewha: Bufftabby[373-417,622], Chronos[538], Biotop[543], BoozySquid[556], Cookies[575], Sachertorte[576], Hooker[621], Drain[638], Raventhief[646]
Paul: Zeriel[529]
I had not considered the fact that with no death reveal scum would not know if they had been successful in eliminating the correct switch holder. This is why I even posed the possibility and asked for input on it. If I can’t bounce ideas off of everyone then I I’m left bouncing them off no one and I’d rather risk looking stupid than pass up a potentially powerful system and could give town a much needed leg up.
My flawed Idea would have forced scum into unusual situations where they have to make tough decisions about how to proceed. But you point out a pretty big flaw in it. Thank you for your feedback. I’m sorry I gave you a reason to vote for me.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
My unofficial vote count:
brewha (11) - Chronos (538), Biotop (543), Boozahol (556), ComeToTheDarkSide (575), sachertorte (576), Hooker (621), bufftabby (622), Drain Bead (638), TexCat (639), Capt. Klutz (640), raventhief (646)
Crys (6) - Guiri (262), Sunny Daze (568), Hockey Monkey (584), DiggitCamara (588), AngeloftheNorth (595), snfaulkner (641)
Pleonast (2) - LightFoot (288), Thing Fish (297)
One vote each:
ToeJam - Idle Thoughts (32)
DiggitCamara - paulwhoisaghost (386)
Sario - Prof. Pepperwinkle (46)
sachertorte - Meeko (203)
TexCat - Plumpudding (88)
Thing Fish - Pleonast (121)
Chronos - Nanook (151)
Meeko - Johnny Bravo (169)
paulwhoisaghost - Zeriel (529)
Capt. Klutz - Crys (583)
Hockey Monkey - Hoopy Frood (663)
I don’t have a problem moving my vote to brewha or Crys, if needed for the second lynch.
My vote was for Crys, not brewha
Sorry, my bad. That makes it 10 and 7.
As was mine. I still make it Brewha 9, Crys 8.
Note to self: do not try to keep a count when Madame Pepperwinkle is talking in the background.
As was already nostalgically shared, NAF and I once confounded a 3rd party by switching the names of our masonly roles.
With no switch reveals upon death, if a switch claimer flips as scum, the switch claimed could still be in play. The dead Scum would just have needed to borrow a teammate’s switch PM details.
I think you guys are making a big mistake. Scum is giggling like school girls because you are doing their work for them. I’m fairly certain I won’t survive the night because I will try and turn off their bodyguard every time I can.
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
Oh and PS those of you that have played with me before know I’m telling you the truth.
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
Possibly, depending on the truthiness of Crys claim:
It depends on if hostile/non-hostile is considered to be part of alignment, as depicted in the alleged role PM. Even if the non-hostile part of Crys’s PM is not accurate, that piece of it still may be in the place she depicts.
I have no reason to lie to you. I am prepared to die. I was thinking that brewha maybe was one of my cultists. Since then they have said they are not. With all the lies that have come up I’m sorry that I thought that. I’m thinking she might be a wolf.
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
Brewha pm matches mine pretty much word for word which I already posted
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
Did I botch the posts when I was reading stuff on my phone…Bah now I have to reread the whole thread for like the sixth time. I will do it tomorrow before but I’m still prepared to die.
Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
Well said ** Hoopy Frood ** I was talking to the 4 leggers and the three legger about this- but I didn’t get it into human words before you did. [sub] yes I could have just said my dogs, but the spit fires among us would have glommed I was a wolf or some such- betcha [/sub]
** bufftabby ** other cultists * could * confirm/ deny the PM accuracy but given the current response they ain’t gonna, are they. [sub] No I am not one of them either [/sub]
We have 3 , 4 (what is the count now?) unprovoked claims either switchers or 3P---- what would be the Scum motovation to draw this sort of scrutiny? pray tell, anyone?
We have a pretty smart bunch here ( ok I don’t know if you are all pretty)
Some of the voters on this current train are looking to blend and should be suspected.
This is my understanding as well and this is why I changed my vote to Crys. This seems fundamentally untrustworthy to me. The cult does not need a town victory in order to win. This does not align with town needs. What am I missing?