I guess with the votes closed, I can go ahead and reveal my true identity.
I’m nilla town
I guess with the votes closed, I can go ahead and reveal my true identity.
I’m nilla town
I was also an early toejam voter, not that it matters.
I think I’m still dying today, but probably Day killed rather than Lynched.
But jeez I don’t approve of the span of votes i collected in less than 100 posts. That’s why 2nd lynches are bad. Because it leads to people like Guiri using that as a reason to excuse their vote:
Yeah, but WHY did you need to vote an unknown 2nd player? Just to utilize the 2nd lynch? That’s the thing people are forgetting. There are DayKillers out there. You may have 2-3 kills during the day, making it 3-4 by adding a 2nd lynch is NOT a good idea. Especially not when the justifications are as shitty as “well, he had a lot of votes day 1” or “Well, he’s active now, but he wasn’t on day 1 so lets lynch the lurker”… like you Nestea .Do you really think “well I’m not caught up but I’m going to vote” is useful?
And Mhaye, I’m not going to claim at 10 votes (when you first asked), nor at 14 votes. But it is interesting that you’re voting me and hinting/asking to get a claim out of me. Since when do you play like that, why not just wait until Day 3? Why did it need to happen in the last 12 hours of mafia, when many people are away and not even able to catch up?
-R
All in all, it’s a rather sloppy day, but I’m pleased people are on the record at least for votes.
**Brewha **I do believe you are scummy.
Satch/Chrys, I still believe one of you needs to die (if not both), but I’m fine with a Vigging not a lynching for it.
SunnyDaze. You’ve done nothing to stop the FOS I had on you at the start of the game.
Guiri. :shrug: I don’t have a read on you. Honestly, in my analysis for D2, I liked most of your posts and thoughts in my first read through to like page 12 or so. After that… less so.
Idle’s vote on me- honestly, all of you guys claiming I’m lurking, how do you feel about Idle? I think he’s gone absent and he’s just never been back here. But it’s interesting that noone brings up his lurking behaviors, but I’m nearly lynched for my previous absence.
Not speaking for the others, but I was pushing for getting someone I consider to be scum - you - instead of Brewha, whom I consider to be town. We’ll see if he is I suppose. You get another Day to show your play.
Next time - a suggestion - you need to put your cards on the table. Do not come out saying you’re going to post a lot, gosh maybe too much, maybe you’re aggressive even, and then disappear. If RL means you can’t play the way you want to play, explain reality, then we can analyze your actions fairly.
I never considered a second lynch a likely outcome.
Was anyone else puzzled by this post by Koldanar?
It looks like he accidentally typed the wrong name in his vote, but I can’t figure out what he meant to type.
And ToeJam, I understand what you’re saying about how mod-kills are bad for the game, but do you know what’s even worse for the game? Someone who needs to be modkilled but isn’t. When someone is on the roster but isn’t participating, then we’re forced to either vote them for a stupid reason, or to give Scum a free pass to go completely undetectable. Modkilling an inactive player is the least bad option available.
As it is right now, because you chose to show up again, we have no choice but to kill you, whether right now, toNight, or toMorrow, because we have no possible way of telling if you’re Scum or not, and we can’t afford to let players like that live.
I have a suggestion.
We tend to focus on events or players present in our minds. And so we miss the lurkers or the “under the radar” or simply post on players based on bias or past games or gut.
This game is huge!! And we need to deal with that.
So I suggest (and will be willing to go first):
Any player can ask me to make a summit of any other player in the game. I have to make a re-read of this player and (very important) state what I make of it.
In exchange I can ask the player I re-read to do the same to a player of my choice.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m in. Last night I enjoyed my short discussion with snfaulkner on third parties. I would be willing to widen the offer to include topics, such as switches, third parties, and so on.
So far participants are (please add your name as we go):
Total Lost
Sunny Daze
I like that. Let’s include topics as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m out, on that. I still haven’t caught up on my second read, and until I do that, I’m playing half-blind. If I had my second-read notes finished, I could easily chime in on any specific topic asked of me, but as it is, it’d just be one more thing keeping me from finishing those.
I was quoting GuiriEnEspañas analysis of snfaulkner. But I’m on mobile on the weekends, and didn’t preview my post. My vote was intended, as snfaulkner wanted to get scum, then voted for a 3Rd party.
Ah, OK, I thought you were saying that Guiri’s vote was bad, but voting for the same person that he was. I should have realized that the “you” was snfaulkner, not Guiri.
Oof, good luck with that. I’m having enough trouble keeping up with this game without being assigned homework.
Personally I don’t see any reason for them to lie. And I fully plan on investigating Sach this evening so if we both survive the night I can semi confirm him/I. Believe me if they come back that they aren’t my faction we will all know if i survive the night.
So, now that i’ve explained reality, you can analyze my actions fairly? And good to know you just wanted to get me real close to being lynched, but you didn’t think it’d happen. Own up your votes and don’t suddenly get weakneed at the end.
And so I've posted my defense to **Hooker**'s stuff.
May I ask, what's your case on why you're so sure I'm scum? Enough that you felt like voting for me?
Is it anything more than "well, you said you'd do X, but then you didn't."
That's really the best scum detection you've gotten in the thousands of posts so far, that's your scummiest finding?:dubious:
-R
Yeah - I know. But we have to do something. And I think it might be a good thing, if my focus isn’t based on what I think or even worse think I know.
So perhaps doing our homework might get us to a better place
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Dusk, Day Two
OK, in light of the delayed dusk, let’s dispense with the cutesy stuff and get right to business. After counting all the votes, and then recounting them, and then importing two officials from Florida to do a third check,
brewha, who was a Townsperson, has been lynched.
Also, and no less regrettable:
Chronos, who was a Mason, has been Day killed by a hail of old-school Tommy-Gun fire.
Night Two begins here and will end at 3:00PM on Tuesday, January 24.
Of note:
Please welcome to the game Cygnus42, who is subbing for Precambrian Mollusc, and Svejk, who is subbing for RedSkeezix. Play nice, everybody!
New night thread or stay in this one?
We’ll stay here. I think doing a thread for each Day/Night Cycle is a nice compromise.
And I guess I’ve now officially caught up, so there’s that!
Besides, I’ve been itching to read that Forbidden Thread.
Whelp…sorry brewha, but you lied and lying is always scummy.