I think that the kill was blocked (rather than not carried out). This is inspired in part by Trepa’s comment that “(…) the second victim of the night proved to not actually be a victim at all! That is to say, not dead. That is to say, alive. Yay, life!” (here). But also, it’s because it would appear that whoever is behind the first two extra night-kills (probably the lurkers, **gregorio **and orcenio) still had one lurker left to take out - PCM, who disappeared. Why decide not to use your killing power, all of a sudden, when there is still a good candidate? Perhaps it’s one of those vigs who only has limited powers, or a remorseful, but how likely is that, given again that this game is supposed to be simple? This would indicate that a kill was tried and failed, which in turn would suggest that someone (possibly fubbles or septimus, since 1) they claimed, making themselves targets; 2) they both say they hid/self-protected) dodged a bullet. To me, it is evidence that there is at least one person in the game who has the power to avoid being killed.
Now **fubbles **announced during the night, all of a sudden, and very early, seeing as there had not even been the option of voting for him, and seeing as the problems that people had with him were quite mild (in my recollection at least, but fubbles agrees at least with regard to SilverJan’s accusations, as he calls them weak straw-grasping). If he had not claimed, a more straightforward case could be made that a vig had tried to take out a self-protecting septimus, lending more credence to his claim that he is a town doctor. The timing of fubbles’s claim (during the night, when vig, sk, and scum can still change their minds on who to take out) is odd to me. It would appear that **fubbles **put himself at risk if he really is a hider, *and *that he made things needlessly complicated for town. **Fubbles **gets called out on his timing by choie, but does not respond. Later, he claims that '(post #947) he was ‘tired of defending [him]self’ - but I don’t feel that he had been doing a whole lot of defending at that point, which makes me think that his claim, prompted so easily, was in fact a way of throwing sand into the (admittedly poorly functioning) town-machine, confusing us and making things needlessly complicated.
The late **Guiri **points out (here) that ‘Between the abstain, the attack on Mahaloth, the handshake attempt, the smilies, the evasiveness, voting the doc, the self-vote with its strained logic, and the claim’, fubbles mostly seems to have been attracting day-time votes, when he should have been attracting night-time kills so that scum would waste a kill on him, eg by trying to look like a power role. If there’s any night-kill he would have been trying to attract, it would probably be a town-aligned vig.
I find all of this highly suspicious and I don’t believe fubbles’s claim. At the same time, I am leaning towards thinking that 1) Septimus *is *in fact the doctor; 2) that a vig tried to kill him and failed, which is why we had only one night-kill last Night. Problem here is, that **Septimus **had not announced he would be self-protecting during N3 like he had before N2; it seems like a big risk for a vig to take. So perhaps there is something else going on here that I am missing. At any rate, my suspicion of **Fubbleskag **stands, so without further ado:
vote fubbleskag