Mafia Watch-Along Thread - NO SPOILERS! [FORBIDDEN TO LIVE PLAYERS]

[TexCat]

@Johnny_Bravo

I think Occam’s Razor works well here. The wolves didn’t know who the remaining mason was and they expected that Sario would be the one to break the tie.

My main suspect right now, obviously, is Diggit. I do tend to get blinders when it comes to accusing people in this game, and I rarely switch my votes without a compelling reason. I will note that e, now a confirmed town, encouraged me to switch my vote off **Diggit **and onto Plum. I didn’t. If I was a wolf who knew that Thing Fish was on the nightkill short list, wouldn’t it have made more sense to follow his lead there? Following a soon-to-be-confirmed townie into a vote on a different townie would have been a safe move.

I don’t buy that those who vote for wolves should be trusted as town. If that were an axiom, this game would be a lot harder. At the moment I’m suspicious of both **Jimmy **and **Cygnus **for following your vote on Plumpudding so close to the end of the day. If you hadn’t claimed as Mason, I’d be all up your ass about it, too. Reading your posts without knowing you’re mason, it really does look like you engineered a save for **Diggit.

**I’m also suspicious of **Mollusc **because a) some of his posts are borderline incomprehensible to me and b) what I can parse involves an awful lot of assumptions where “likely town” translates into “confirmed town” in his calculations.

There’s the explanation for what the wolves were thinking during the Sario lynch, straight from the [del]horse’s[/del] wolf’s mouth.

I wonder about the defense of “I would never do that if I were a wolf”. Is that a sure scum tell? Anyone know or studied it?

It sure looks like it in this case, especially as it’s followed by something so complicated as knowing who was on the NK short list and what a “safe move” is.

I would be willing to bet that the wolves had a discussion last night about bussing each other.