Years ago a woman that I found unattractive asked me if I wanted to have a threesome with her and a woman that I did find attractive. I decided no, I didn’t.
But then girl on girl sex has never been one of my biggest fantasies anyway.
Been there, did that.
(I was single, so cool it back there in the cheap seats)
It was a great time. One of them was a pretty good friend of mine, the other was her partner and while neither of them were my ‘type’, or stunners, they were both decent enough looking that I MIGHT have been interested in regardless of their being straight or gay.
You have to consider the available alternatives.
Was it a case of “Do I go have a threesome with these two semi-attractive women or do I go have sex with Jessica Alba, who was hitting on me earlier?” Or was it more like “Do I go have a threesome with these two semi-attractive women or do I go home and watch Seinfeld reruns?”
[Moe]
All right! I’m going to sit at home and ogle the ladies in the Victoria’s Secret catalog. [buzz]
Sears catalog. [ding]
[/Moe]
If I don’t find either one attractive, then they’re not going to be any more attractive together. I mean, you can put all the naked Janet Reno’s into a big jacuzzi that you want, have them get all lesbian with each and it’s not going to make it any more sexy…
Neither.
I think I had been too generous in my description of the lesbian couple. They were not attractive (to me). Keep in mind these are real lesbians and not porno fantasy lesbians.
It was a case of I’m meeting a friend’s lesbian roommates, neither of whom I find attractive, and I had just started a relationship with my current SO. So in that context, it was a no brainer.
But if I was single, my “hey, why the hell not?” attitude may have prevailed.
I’m thinking along the same lines as John Carter of Mars, life’s too short to dance(horizontally or vertically) with ugly women.
Enjoy,
Steven
They sure do, and the kind they like is, in my view, much sexier than the cookie-cutter dragon-lady-nails and fake boobs “girl on girl” stuff.
(not a lesbian, but I like lesbian porn)
Lisa - Doughies has terrible pizza.
Homer - But there’s two!
I looked through all the stickies, but I found no mention of this rule. This is an oversight.
Under no circumstances should the words “Janet Reno,” “Jacuzzis,” and “Threesomes,” be mentioned together in any thread.
Eww.
Seconded.
Just to clarify, they were both in their early 20s. So more of this Janet Reno talk.
So I probably shouldn’t use the words “Janet Reno”, “fishnet stockings”, “stripper pole” and “naked fan dance” either?
Basically- I think it thusly- couples who are into each other are sexy. Lesbians who are into each other are super-sexy. As long as we’re talking about average-to-middling looking people, it sounds quite mullable.
Although, and not that I’m asking for myself, this:
you can put all the naked Janet Reno’s into a big jacuzzi that you want, have them get all lesbian with each and it’s not going to make it any more sexy…
has “Sig” written all over it
I’m pretty glad that I don’t watch television news. I don’t know what Janet Reno looks like.
Edited to answer the actual question: I’d probably go for it, unless I was actively turned off by them, just for the novelty of it.
You, sir, are one sick individual. We should get along famously.
And 11811, that is a most excellent idea. If slortar gives me permission, consider it done.
You know, I think most guys, personal ethics or other commitments permitting, would gladly have a twosome with a woman they did not find particularly attractive – within limits, and so long as it were only a one-night stand.
Hell, some guys will risk arrest and other hazards to pay for sex with hookers – and a lot of streetwalkers I’ve seen look pretty disgusting, yet they still somehow manage to earn a living.
Given the choice, I’d prefer to always relieve myself in a gold-plated urinal kept dutifully stocked with ice by 24-hour attendants, as a violin quartet serenaded my micturition.
It’s amazing how less choosy one gets about locale and amenities when you’ve really gotta go.
Freudian omission?