Marshmallow, you sexist pig

And why would you lump in porn with aggression? Or unemotional with either? Someone who is unemotional isn’t going to be interested in porn ( or women for that matter ), nor are they going to be aggressive. And I’d expect someone who is into porn to be less aggressive towards women because they have another outlet.

God. That is so interesting**

Porn makes men less aggressive because they have “another outlet.”

For what?

Sex with women calms men down?

Makes them less liable to rape?

What is it about misongynists that blames the agression of males on the fact that they just cannot get enough sex from women?

Really?

If only…

If only…they could find a good, reliable, exciting sexual partner…if every male could achieve this Zanadu…there would be no rape.**

Bleh.

My old male astronomy professor loved gothic romance novels. Personally, I think it was just a hail marry attempt to rip the fabric of space time :slight_smile:

What, exactly, is misogynistic about the idea that having a sexual outlet will make men less likely to use violence to achieve sex? It sounds like a pretty logical hypothesis to me.

Yes to both. Sex makes men happy. Women too, as a rule. Something that anyone not blinded by ideology knows.

Reality? Is it so hard to understand that a frustrated person is a grumpy person? It’s not the only reason, but certainly it’s A reason. And it has nothing to do with misogyny.

Not nearly as much; there wouldn’t be any point. Ideological fantasies about how “rape is always about power” aside, rape is primarily about sex, just as theft is primarily about money. Also, “aggression towards women and rape” are not synonyms, especially in this context.

And it’s spelled “Xanadu”

No kidding?

So the whole concept of “Lysistrata” was bassakwards?

If women denied men sex in order to keep them from going off to war was entirely ridiculous? Because…if**men are
denied
sex, it only makes them more prone to aggression and rape - well…

…these poor damsels were so ill informed about sex that they may have well have abandoned their homes and children to the destruction of war and just waited for male competition and aggression to sort itself out?

Is it ocytocin?

What IS it that makes males want to Quit**[/Bstriving]
for asendance?

Give this female something that doesn’t make you guys seem like more of the same.

Actually, you could turn it around and say that they were offering sex as a bribe to stay home. It’s hardly effective blackmail if the men are still denied sex if they comply.

Actually, you could turn it around and say that they were offering sex as a bribe to stay home. It’s hardly effective blackmail if the men are still denied sex if they comply.

WTF?

Der…

Am impressed with the size of your gonads…

But understand that your “bottom line” is always that (and in every thread) women are so effing persnickity about giving sex to …you…

I’m with ya Der…

But who could blame them?

Just askin’…

I have to disagree with the idea that men liking porn has anything to do with emotions. Even people with mental disorders that prevent them from having emotional relationships (Asbergers, Schitzo-effective PD, etc.) still like sex and porn. And don’t forget the BBC studies showing that “falling in love” is more of a physical response than an emotional one…

Heck, porn can be seen as a fulfillment of a dominant fantasy. My simple brain could think that I’ve just made these women pose like that just for my pleasure. In other words, I just got rewarded for being aggressive!

(No, reward =/= emotion. Basic human psychology requires you to enjoy what you are doing, even aggression. You think people would be aggressive if they didn’t get some pleasure out of it?)

Uh… you’re aware that that was a work of fiction, right? It’s not a historical treatise, it’s the ancient Greek equivalent of a Judd Apatow movie.

Yeah, I’d say it’s pretty ridiculous. Of course, it was meant to be a comedy, so that’s probably intentional.

That’s not exactly the argument that’s being offered. We are, after all, talking specifically about that subset of men who are predisposed to rape. Most men are not rapists. No amount of not getting laid is going to turn the average man into a rapist. Of those who will rape, the reasons why they attack women are not going to be uniform. Certainly, for some uncertain percentage of them, the urge to commit sexual violence is present regardless of other possible outlets. But it does not seem at all exceptional to me to suggest that some portion of potential rapists do so because their sex drive is frustrated by a lack of outlets, and so they create one without regard to the willingness of the other person. If pornography provides an outlet, then it seems self-evident that it will reduce the incidence of rape among that particular portion of the rape-inclined male population.

I… don’t really understand what either of these sentences are supposed to mean.

I kind of suspect that you have an unrealistic baseline for male behavior, so I’m not sure that this is a reasonable request.

It’s rather obvious. “Make peace or no sex” rather implies “Make peace and you’ll get sex”, otherwise it wouldn’t work even in fiction.

What in the world are you talking about?

Lust is an emotion. And emotional responses are ALL also physical responses; if some sort of damage renders the physical responses impossible, then the emotion weakens or vanishes as well.

Or for being submissive or for all sorts of other things. Porn and aggression have no special connection.

(No, reward =/= emotion. Basic human psychology requires you to enjoy what you are doing, even aggression. You think people would be aggressive if they didn’t get some pleasure out of it?)
How interesting…

Do males come clean about these very basic things to females they begin to interact with in their teens?

Don’t think so.

Do Fathers “come clean” about these things to their daughters when the daughters begin to date?

Don’t think so.

They check out the short skirts of their daughters…they ‘size up’ the “intentions” of the males dating their daughters…

… and then keep their effin mouths shut.

And why is that?

Oh. My.God.

How females need to be educated.

Males will say anything to get the panties off some female.

Why won’t Dads share that?

Honestly?

It boggles the mind.

It’s more than not exceptional; it’s obvious. In fact, the people who claim that rape is always about power and never about sex are implicitly claiming that even the most ruthless, brutal man who is sexually frustrated will never rape, unless he also has a political agenda. I guess all the apolitical thugs will just have to stew in frustration.

What makes you think they don’t?

Can you explain how any of this post relates to what BigT said? Because you appear to have quoted him, and that launched off on a rant that has absolutely nothing to do with anything that’s been said in this thread.

Also, it would be an enormous help if you learned how to use the quote function in your posts. Just click the blue button that says “Quote” at the bottom of the post to which you’re responding. It makes it much easier for the rest of us to tell which words are yours, and which belong to someone else.

What “things” are you talking about?

Keep their mouths shut about what? How short their daughters skirts are? :confused:

Why is what?

Who says that they don’t? Are you trying to suggest that dads want their daughters to get fucked?

I admit, I’m pretty thoroughly boggled over here. I think anyone trying to understand your posts is going to have that reaction.

“Who says that they don’t? Are you trying to suggest that dads want their daughters to get fucked?”

Are you kidding me?

Of COURSE Dad’s don’t want “their daughters to get fucked”…by some teenage twit they know is only looking to get their Johnson serviced…

But…are you trying to tell me that MOST dads apprise their daughters of this?

Are you?

Jesus Christ!

Do you think women are stupid?!

If THEIR DADS had ever told them that their teenage boyfriends would say things like: I love you. I’ll be with FOREVER. We’ll have children together.

And had then said to them: "Don’t ever believe this bullshite…Teenage boys are just horndogs looking to get into anyone’s pants. And will say and/or promise anything to get to intercourse with you. That there would be so many young females falling for this bullshit?

(And please don’t take points off because I don’t know how to use the technical stuff…not thinking about that…)

Yes, I’m pretty sure most dads tell their daughters this. Since we both agree that most dad’s don’t want their daughters to be fucked, why would you think they wouldn’t tell their daughters this?

Have you ever met a teenager? “Listening to their parents’ advice” generally isn’t high on their lists of to-dos.

Look, you’ve got a teenage girl. Her body is a nuclear cocktail of hormones that’s primed to go off at any moment. She’s got her dad, who’s, like, old and stuff, giving her all these stern warnings, just like he’s been doing for her entire goddamned life. Then she goes out with that cute guy from school, who says these incredible wonderful things to her, that she’s never heard anyone say to her before, that’s exactly what she wants someone to say to her. Which way do you think she’s going to jump? I can tell you right now, the vast majority of people, teenage or otherwise, don’t listen to what they need, they listen to what they want.

Now, all that out of the way, would you mind telling me what in the bloody blue fuck any of this has to do with anything?

“Technical stuff?” All you have to do is click on one, clearly labeled button. If you can work a keyboard, you can use the quote function on this board.

:smack:

Well, you figured out the quote button, so good on you for that.

Should I interpret the head-smack smiley as your way of saying, “My God, he’s right! How could I have been so blind as to disagree with him”?

“Look, you’ve got a teenage girl. Her body is a nuclear cocktail of hormones that’s primed to go off at any moment.”

Jesus.

What the hell is wrong with that?