Mary Kate vs. Ashley: Mom liked ME best!
So prefrontal lobotomy eyes are considered sexy now? Who’d ‘a’ thunk it?
And what exactly is supposed to be the appeal of identical twins, anyway? I can see that two women are better than one, but wouldn’t it make more sense to go for variety?
What about those who play on a dirt field?
[sub]Okay, I’m going now…[/sub]
You’re a sick man.
I think their next movie should be more along the lines of good, wholesome fun. Like maybe Mary-Kate has a big date coming up, so she practices kissing with Ashley. And if they happen to both be in their nighties while they are kissing, that’s fine too. And maybe the next day they can have a water-pistol fight while wearing thin cotton t-shirts. Or maybe Ashley is bad, and has to get a spanking from Mary-Kate. You know, all those fun things that kids do.
I’d like to see Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Mary-Kate and Ashley.
But maybe that’s just me.
Those are the ugliest cute kids I’ve ever seen. Bleck!
Mary Kate & Ashley GONE WILD!
Mary Kate vs Ashley live on Pay Per View
They are NOT identical twins, as far as I know.
Thank you. I really try.
cmonidareya, they’re fraternal twins worth something like a cool billion.
Which they’ll promptly blow on crack and blowup dolls of Ricky Schroder…
So what, cmonidareya? They still look just alike.
Wonder where you inflate one of those things…
Just to let you all know, as this may be a sign that the world is about to end - MK&A have made the FHM magazine’s top 100 [babe] list!
I am amazed by the virulence that certain posters in this thread have cast in the direction of these excellent, gifted youngsters. Shame on you all. They’re good kids who don’t deserve your sneering perversion.
I feel that two actresses with such enormous talents would transform just about any movie they deigned to make.
I was just referring to Chronos’ post about not seeing the appeal of identical twins. Technically, they are not identical, regardless of how much they look alike.
Yes, they’re fraternal, not identical twins. Cite.
More than you could ever want to know: http://www.marykateandashley.com/ They’ve got screensavers!
Say what you want kids…
A) They’re pretty easy on the eyes
B) Anyone who says they’re ‘stupid’ or any other non-smart concept is a fool. Those kids have leveraged themselves to a fare-the-well. Sure, at the beginning it was all adults doing it. But at this point those two are as sophisticated at image-making as Madonna.
In their field they’re brilliant. Much more so than most of us.
I actually (in a detached sort of way) look forward to seeing if they can make the transition from kid stars with kid market to adult movies and television. That would be one hell of a leap.
Easy on the eye? They’re snaggletoothed. They look like aliens.
Most child stars don’t make that leap. Their cutsey appeal doesn’t translate to paying adults. With any luck, their careers will never get off the ground.
I think you’re letting something get in the way. They’re attractive VERY young women.
Even if they don’t make the leap they’ll still be set. That’s why it’ll be interesting to see if they can make it. They certainly seem better managed and marketed than your average child star.