There’s a new magazine out, folks
it’s titled mary-kateandashley
I’m not making this up
whimper
Damn. Little Prostitues is all they are. Anything to make a buck and keep their faces in the limelight.
We stock the abomination of which you speak. In a moment of perverse self-destructive curiousity, I read it.
Now I know what hysterical blindness is like.
There’s a new book out, too. Authored by Britney Spears and her mother. Now you tell me, which is worse when you really think about it? A Mother’s Gift
Ummmmmm…
Uhhhhhhhhh…
Is there honestly a MARKET for this crap? I mean, how many trailer parks are there? There can’t be that many, can there? Who’s actually BUYING this stuff?
That’s it, I’m leaving… stop the planet here, I want off…
Oh, and BTW, Britney Spears actually WROTE something? See, that I’d pay money to see…
Prosti-tots, Saint Zero. The term is prosti-tots.
Are Mary Kate and Ashley ever gonna branch out, and you know, go to the mall (GASP) BY THEMSELVES? How long can you work the freakish twin thing?
Sounds like a Larry Flynt publication. Maybe he can hook up with them and bring child pornography into the 21st century.
“If kiddie porn is outlawed, only outlaws will have kiddie porn.”
“Why?!” I hear you cry. “Why?!”
This is why.
From Smeghead’s link:
See? SEE?!?!?!? I told you. A Larry Flynt pictorial if ever I heard of one. Ick. I feel dirty, now.
Wait just a minute there. I live in a trailer park and I don’t buy any of that stuff.
While I admit there is a lot about Britney I wouldn’t mind seeing, her ability to write is not included on the list. 
Ye Gods. Although one thing doesn’t really surprise me:
I guess some people just have to make money at all cost. How pathetic.
Having just seen some color photos of my wife’s recent surgery I’d like to point out that deep inside, we’re all pretty gross.
Ya still need a sig? This seems to fit the bill
In addition to the horror of it, am I the only one sort of thrown by the dash? To me, it looks like “Soda – carbonated drink of the Gods” or “Eggs – they’re not just for breakfast.” To me, the part after the dash should modify or explain the part before it, like “Mary – Mother of Jesus.” So when I saw “mary-kateandashley” my first thought was “What?” And my second thought was “Maybe if the first issue sells well (which God forbid), they’ll be able to purchase a shift key AND a space key.”
And am I the only one who thinks that they are singularly, um, not-so-pretty?
I haven’t yet seen this magazine… so I figured the title as originally-postedwasatypo…
But according to the link so thoughtfully provided by smeghead, they’re the friggin’ EDITORS. Perhaps the title is to be expected. For some reason, I don’t equate the Olsen twins with thorough knowledge of typesetting… but maybe that’s just me.
Lok, I apologize for my hasty generalization. But I’ll rescind that apology if we find out you have ANY Elvis memorabilia in yout trailer… 
Nope, you’re not, Jodi. I believe it was Cranky who first used my favorite descriptive of the Olsen twins:
Simian.
The “lovely” twins are discussed (at length) in this thread:
Die, Gibbon Girls
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?threadid=56735
(I gotta learn me how to do them fancy links someday)
There is no God.
My mistake. There IS a God, and He is a cruel, merciless God.
If mary-kateandashley is the 7th sign of the Apocalypse, then Rosie: The Magazine must be the 8th sign.
It’s because “Mary-Kate” is hyphenated. So you could just blame their parents (I know I do).
BTW, the frightening thing about the Olsen twins “singularly, um, not-so-pretty” faces are that they are actually fraternal twins, not identical. So they both got to look that way completely by accident.
(I read that they were fraternal many years ago, when people fretted that as they grew up, they would no longer be able to share the role of the icky baby on “Full House.” Checking on-line, the fact that they are not identical is confirmed by many sources, including this one: http://people.aol.com/people/sp/tv40/return17.html)