Massive measles outbreak - thank you, Andrew Fucking Wakefield

You’re right. I mixed up the incidents since Rhys Morgan was the same kid who did expose the the Bleach scam, albeit as used for Chrohn’s disease, and got a nasty reception as a result.

Bleach. Fucking Bleach.

The irony, it burns…

Oh? Do tell.

Burzynski does unproven quack cancer treatments, not industrial-bleach-enema treatments for non-verbal autistic children. But there’s a lot of overlap between the nutbars in those communities.

What, and run the danger of attracting attention?

uses curlcoat as a windowpane

:: passes Inner Stickler some Windex to wipe drool off said pane ::

You’re a little late in that regard.

LOOK AT ME!! LOOK AT ME!!!

DON’T LOOK AT ME!! DON’T LOOK AT ME!!

Yes, curlcoat, I know. Those aren’t the exact words that you wrote, so no need to bother with the whole “I never said that” schtick.

Sorry about that weird double post upthread - have no idea how that happened.

Rhys Morgan is a pretty exceptional kid for putting up with the threatening reactions he received in both of those situations.

I see that the usual suspect has returned to beg for scraps of attention in the ongoing saga of “FUCKING PAY ATTENTION TO ME ASSHOLES.”

I can’t remember if this has been brought up yet or not, but the usual anti-science conspiracy theory assholes are claiming the Welsh measles epidemic is a hoax.

I pointed it out in post #369, but it never hurts to point a second finger at the kookery.

It also isn’t even close to what you should have been able to understand from what I wrote, but given your abilities…it is so pathetic that you seem to think that anyone who posts something you don’t like must be just looking for attention. Is this because it is a juvenile thing you do? I know it must be hard to think beyond age 12, but this happens to be a message board for adults so you really should give it a try.
The irony in that link is that those two were booted from the conference because of the assumption they didn’t share the mindset of the others, which you all appear to think is awful. Yet when you do the same to me … :dubious:

A new front in the pushback against antivax nuttery has been opened in Australia, where there is a newspaper campaign (organized by the Sunday Telegraph and Daily Telegraph) to permit child care centers to bar unvaccinated children, and to end government child care subsidies to parents who don’t get their children immunized.

Naturally this is outraging antivax dingbats. For instance, NaturalNews is foaming at the mouth about the campaign encouraging “medical terrorism” and comparing the newspapers’ editor to a serial child abuser (Jimmy Saville).

Stay classy, antivaxers.

Sorry Curlcoat. I completely missed the part where the police were called to frog march you out the door.

No assumption here. You’ve proven to us you don’t share a similar mindset.

And, unless I’m mistaken, you’re still free to post. In fact, unless I’m very greatly mistaken, the only thing we’ve done is say you were wrong (backed by plenty of evidence).

I fail to see how that is anything remotely close to calling the police on you or throwing you out of a group that requires an entrance fee (it’s still free to post, isn’t it?). Better yet, I fail to see the relevance when your posts aren’t censored and you aren’t banned, merely mocked.

I knew you were dumb. But you don’t have to flaunt it all the time.

Failed gotcha, in a big way? :dubious:

Yeah, sure guys. I said that the two were exactly alike. :rolleyes:
What I did say was that you all didn’t like the fact that the reporters were tossed just because they might not agree with everything at the convention, but have no trouble beating on me because I might not agree with everything you all say/believe. But, again, it is difficult to understand things when you think like a 12 year old.

Here, I’ll try to communicate with you on your level:

Dur, hehe, she different, lets throw things! Dur.

You made the comparison, albeit with a wink wink nudge nudge. It is not our fault that the comparison was a complete failure.

There is still a huge difference. We ‘beat on you’ because your are demonstrably wrong or outright spreading FUD. We have not banned you, we have not threatened you, we have not called the police and told the police lies about what you have done. Your comparison could not be more wrong, hence your attempt at ‘irony’ is pure failure.

We understand what you are trying to say - the problem is that you are utterly wrong. The comparison is invalid.

Then I would suggest that you start to think like an adult so you won’t make such silly comparisons.

No one is beating on you. You are saying things that are wrong and people are pointing out why and where you are wrong. We’re a site dedicated to fighting ignorance, remember?

It’s not our fault that you are spectacularly and repeatedly wrong; that falls directly on your shoulders.

Bullshit.

You’re implying your situations are similar enough to be compared.

Those folks didn’t even get a chance to speak. They were recognized and escorted out. They weren’t roundly mocked at the conference. Of course, they were never given a chance to be mocked in the first place.

You got your say. You haven’t been escorted out of the forum. Your posting privileges are still there.

And this part is the icing:

As this proves, you are allowed to try to give as good as you get. It’s pretty bad as mockery goes, but I frankly don’t expect much better from you, given the rather complete lack of intelligence you’ve thus far displayed.

In fact, we’re still engaging you (why, I have no clue), so your viewpoint isn’t being suppressed in any manner. It’s just being mocked for the stupidity it is.

It’s different enough a situation as to be unrecognizable from being escorted out of a conference by police for trespassing having had no say nor a chance at a say.

So, you still fail miserably, but I can’t help your incompetence, only correct it.

Are you mistaking the mirror for a 12 year old?