Anybody who has been in the BBQ Pit here recently knows that I’ve had an ongoing spat with Helena330, over a thread that started in the IMHO section, where a user named Esco asked for advice on how to deal with his cocaine-snorting businesswoman girlfriend. Everyone was telling this guy he should ditch her, and that it was very likely she would start stealing from him in order to pay for his coke habit, but he was being stubborn and wouldn’t listen to reason. So, I posted a very forceful, polemical and some have argued sexist post here, straightforwardly telling him to dump her, and using some vulgar terms to do it.
Helena said that the reason Esco wouldn’t leave his cocaine-using girlfriend was because he was “thinking with his dick”, but added that I wasn’t thinking at all, evidently offended by the brash terms I used to describe Esco’s girlfriend, calling my post misogynistic shit. I felt that the term thinking with your dick was a little sexist and anti-male, so I decided to pit her. It didn’t go the way I thought it would, and almost everyone, save two users, took her side over mine.
Looking over it, I now realize Helena was correct about it. I was being an asshole, and there was no need for me to use the terms “bitch” and “broad” to describe Esco’s girlfriend, no matter how conniving and dangerous I thought she potentially was. I kind of overreacted to Helena’s “thinking with his dick” quip, and shouldn’t have started a whole pit over it, which just ended up in more embarrassment for me.
To Helena: I apologize. You were right, I wasn’t thinking like a rational person, I was being an abrasive ass, and should’ve couched my warnings to Esco over his drug-addled girlfriend in a non-misogynistic, but still serious, tone. Now, I think we should call it a day, and let bygones be bygones.
P.S.—I still believe that Esco’s continued relationship with this woman will be his downfall if he doesn’t start taking her drug issues seriously, but that is his prerogative, I guess.