Three weeks back the Sunday NY Times ran a column in the Business section about the age-old issue of “who pays the check?”
There was this line from the piece: “Many men like to pick up the bill; it makes them feel powerful and masculine.”
Then just this past week the Times ran a letter critical of the article that read: “Why encourage men to use money to feel powerful instead of humane?”
(Incidentally, both the article and the letter were written by women).
Now personally, I think that men paying for women is utterly sexist and unfair (and I told the Times so in a letter that they did not run) but that is not what this thread is about, okay? If it was, I’d have posted in GD.
No, my Q concerns this supposed sense of “power” that men get by paying for women on dates. By power, I think people are really talking about sexual entitlement, as in “I paid for dinner, so you better put out after dinner.” But maybe not – I’ll leave that up to the discussion.
Anyway, I have often heard this power business being dragged into the “who pays?” question – mostly by women, arguing on both sides of the issue. Trouble is, I have no idea what the hell they are talking about. If anyone goes around sporting a sense of entitlement these days, I think it’s single women. When I pay for a date, the last thing I feel is powerful. In fact, I feel awfully put-upon, like I’m trapped in a lose-lose situation:
- Don’t pay the whole check and you’re a loooooser, or
- Pay it all and she’s thinking “Thanks for dinner… sucker!”
Men, in this day and age do any of you guys really feel powerful by paying the check? Do you think it entitles you to sexual favors afterwards?
Women, in this day and age do you feel powerless when a guy pays? Do you really think guys feel entitled to sexual favors after they’ve paid for dinner? (Mind you, I didn’t ask if he was entitled to favors, only if you think he feels entitled to favors.)
Thanks all. Let’s keep it civil.