Michael Douglas, you are a dink

It could have been a win-win for everybody. You and your wife get 20 million pounds (the British money kind); I get to see Catherine Zeta-Jones in Victoria’s Secret stuff.

But noooooooooooo…

Fucker.

Urge to kill rising…

Good Grief, Michael. Insecure much? We get to look at her in undies, but you get to undress her with your teeth, if you want…

Sigh.

Hasn’t she been naked or near naked in more than one of her movies, anyway? And what’s up with not allowing your wife to do something when it wouldn’t involve her taking off her clothes – he put the kibosh on her designing a line of lingerie. What kind of sense does that make?

The man is a (checking to see if this is the Pit, yes, it is, okay, cool) massive tool.

**
Not any I know of. I’ve searched. Painstakingly.

And you missed her very first movie? Les Mille et une nuits (alternatively called 1001 Nights or Sheherazade in English). It was released in 1990.

Things are looking up. :smiley:

I second tomndebb’s recommendation. The views are neither long nor explicit, but they’re views nonetheless. I give it a big, err…, thumb, up.

Blue Juice has a nice sex scene which includes whipped cream and Dr. Who’s son :wink:

Er, you do know you’re commenting on a news story that originated in the “Daily Star”?

Massive pinches of salt required all round.

More likely facts: Company offers money, amount undisclosed but not anything like that quoted. She turns it down, not interested, not enough. The rest is a product of a tabloid journalist’s fevered imagination.

Well, I don’t think d.i.n.k. is the correct term (double income, no kids). But I guess when you’re closing in on Lazarus and you are married to one of the ten most beautiful women I’ve ever seen and your body is developing an ever-increasing tolerance/resistance to Viagra, you have to guard what is your’s in every way you can.

Of course, as Futile noted, celebrity news is often as fictional as the characters the actors portray.

Maybe he’s holding out for someone to pay him to keep his clothes on instead.

I don’t get it.

On the one hand, Douglas is a sniveling, jealous, loser, who’ll apparently stop at nothing to keep his lover clad. But on the other, the people before her had no problem modeling the “raunchy lingerie”.

Can’t really win, can ya?

Tight wad if you don’t, sleaze if you do.

I just don’t get it : what is the big frikkin’ deal with Zeta Jones. I don’t find her the least bit attractive. Hasn’t anyone noticed the woman has a bloody moustache in Zorro !?!?!?

Is it just me ?

Nope, I find her less attractive than a loose piece of moss.

I don’t mean to rain on anybody’s boner but she and Douglas, Griffith and Banderas all typify what turns me off about Hollywood today. Gaudy egos brought on by shoddy acting and mediocre looks.

20,000,000 pounds? Michael, you’re a putz.

FWIW, I’m a heterosexual woman and I think she’s beautiful.

Can’t blame Mike for being insecure. One day Zeta-Jones is going to realize she’s married to a skanky old man with a wattle and run screaming out of there…

but he starred in Fatal Attraction, and Basic Instinct… so what is good for the goose, is not good for the gander?

Jerk.

BTW, Mrs. Prefect and I would both leave each other for Cathy.

Uh, does this line mean what I think it does?

That they’re going to be dusting off the old James Coburn movies that were rip-offs of the Bond films and remaking them? If true, then I’m glad she didn’t get the £20 million, but Mike’s still a putz anyway. (Basic Instinct sucked as has most of Mike’s work since Wall Street.)

He doesn’t want us to see her in her bloomers, yet in the photo accompanying the article we can see 50% of her breasts.