Moon Landing Hoax

I am very suprised that so maby of you have the cheek to bad mouth my report when hardly eany of you have seen it. I am not trying to get everyone to believe the moon landing was a hoax, i am simply trying to show people the evidence to support it is there. I am also very upset that some people would have the shocking ignorance to suggest i believe the awful shuttle disaster was a hoax. That is down right stupidity, that was a tragic disaster that resulted in some very great Astronauts loosing their lifes, if you had of actually read my report you would know that it only refers to the moon landings of the 60’s and 70’s and not about todays Space Programme. In future please keep your stupid and disrespectful commetns to yourself.

But i would like to point out one fact that most annti hoax websites seem to ignore. NASA have been asked many times to show the plans of the Lunar Module, but they say that all original plans and blueprints have been destroyed. I find this very hard to believe for several reasons, one, by showing the plans that would shut a lot of pro-hoaxers up, two, the plans could be very useful for future missions, and three which i think is the most important, is that NASA spent 300 billion dollars of tax payers money on that mission, and they have no offical plans or documentation to prove that they spent that money on a real working Lunar Module that went to the moon, i find that very strange as NASA now have no proof of what they spent that money on. If anyone could give me an answer to this then i would be very grateful.

magicman, the reason you’re being rubbished is that you admitted yourself that you’re just recycling stuff you’ve seen on the internet - stuff that we’ve all seen before too, and have seen how much of a crock the “evidence” if fakery is, and talked about it on these boards over and over again.

Also, I’d love to find out how you explain why the hoax would have been pepetrated, and why the Ruskies didn’t blow the whistle?

Anyway, what the hell, email your report to me (click the “email” button below).

As for the LEM blueprints, do you mean these?

Oh, and even if the blueprints had been destroyed, there are still protoype and test model LEMs in Houston (and Huntsville, AL, I think).

I would very much like to know where i admitted that i have simply copied stuff from the net, because as far as i remember i did no such thing. And as for those being the offical blueprints, their not,t hey are simply the copies released by the NASA press office to the worlds media, i have already told you the plans and documents were destroyed, thats not some fadct i made up that is what NASA said, and as for there being the test modules i know they exist, but again NASA say that they are not exaclty the same as the real thing as the conditons on Earth are different from those on the moon, and even so, i would still have expected NASA to keep the plans so they can easily see how they made the Lunar Module, and its not only the original blueprints that have been destroyed its the supporting documents as well!!

Well I was basing that on this:

So are you going to email me your report, then?

It is very ignorant of you to say that just because i have looked up something on the internet and say i have copied it all. I am getting very annoyed with people having a go at me for simply showin the facts for the pro-hoax theory have some credibility.

I am unable to e-mail anybody the report as it is too time consuming to do so, so anybody wishing to see the report should go to this website find the truth it also has a slide show of pictures at the bottom.

Magicman. If you’re going to try and convince us that the whole thing was a fake, why not link to one of the better hoax sites? Yours was awful. At least http://www.apollohoax.com/ has better pictures (but, of course, merely repeats the same li(n)es as all the others).

Oh, dear ! And you’re from the UK… :frowning:

Over the last few years I’ve received several emails from the US, all pointing to a French website (or it’s subsequent derivatives) that prove conclusively that the Pentagon was not struck by an Airliner on 9/11 but by a bomb/missile/whatever, fired on the orders of thye CIA (and George, of course). It then got even more believable by categorically proving that they also ordered the attacks on the Twin Towers and then blamed it on Al Qaeda…

What do conspiracy theorists do when it’s time to stop work ?

Dear magicman,

As a courtesy, please feel free to use the CAPS button provided for free on your keyboard. It makes your posts so much easier to read and, perhaps, take seriously. giggle

Yours sincerely,

BMalion

Why should NASA pay for an entire warehouse to keep obsolete plans that will never be used again, just so that fools, lunatics, and liars could say, “See! They spent millions of dollars in taxpayers’ money just to make and store all these fake blueprints!”

Which is exactly what would happen.

You know John W. Kennedy you are right, NASA already spent 30 billion dollars, so i guess the cost of a filling cabinet or two would be too much. Oh, wait you said they would need an entire warehouse, i thought you were joking, i am sorry, i did not realise you were being serious. Let me put in simple language for you, a warehouse is a big big building where they store lots and lots of stuff or very big stuff, neither of those apply to the plans.

And can i make one thing clear it is not only the original copies that were destroyed, all copies were as well, including the ones in the archives in Washington.

When i asked for an answer to my question i didn’t expect a bunch of stupid clobbered together trash that provides no answer at all.

Don’t show off your ignorance. I said warehouse and I meant warehouse. Even an ordinary airliner has more blueprints than it can carry.

If anyone is showing off thier ignorance its you, i am perfectly aware that airlines have a lot of plans for their aircraft, but thats because they have plans for evey aircraft they operate, which can be hundreds, NASA only built one Lunar Module, not enough plans to fill an entire warehouse, and i doubt that they have destroyed all the rocket and shuttle plans they made.

magicman, you speak of ‘ignorance’. What makes you so well-informed?

when my father worked at NASA, he told me of a blueprint document he’d seen. It was a huge volume, running to about a thousand pages of foolscap. The product? A single screwdriver.

The Skylab plans were indeed housed in a warehouse. I see no reason that the LEM plans weren’t housed similarly. Now think about all the different pieces of kit that NASA both commissioned, researched and built, and the volume of paper specifications - that’s a lot of warehousing.

at last we have a sensible answer, than you jiim, i understand your point, but it still doesn’t answer my question, why did NASA destory all the plans and all copies of the plans, they could have kept parts of them to prove they exisited but they destroye the whole lot and every single copy of it.

Even if the plans existed, what are the odds that the magicman would believe them? If you’re not prepared to accept the first hand evidence of the guys that actually went to the moon, you’re not going to believe anything.

Most of you people are so amazingly ignorant, stuck in your own little world oblivious to whats going on around you. For goodness sake wake up, i have already told you i am only trying to get people to consider the pro-hoax facts, i am not trying to get you all to believe it was a hoax (that would be very difficult because you are all so stupid). But still you keep having a go at me, keep insulting me, get over it. I asked a simple question and so far only one person has come up with a suitable response, not an answer mind you.

“pro-hoax facts”? Facts??? FACTS???

Oh. Wait. Never mind. I’m stupid.

This is just gettin on my nerves, can people please read my report at find the truth and look at the pics and then look it up on the net before you come back to me and start having a go, because i have had enough of people telling the landings did happen, i will say it again i am not claiming they did not happen i am just showing some facts that support the hoax theory, and yes you are stupid because i doubt you have read my report and looked into the matter properly

OK. Against my better judgement I read the site you linked to. All of this so-called “evidence” has been debunked ad nauseam.

Please, I beg you to read The Bad Astronomer’s response to all this “evidence” (his link is in his post above).