Bosstone:
I’m not talking about things like economic policy. I appreciate that you think we’re all mad, but that sort of thing is complex and requires debate. I’m talking about things that are proven obviously wrong with a single cite, like his claiming that Romney will win 400+ electoral votes. You could plan to vote for Romney, you could argue in favor of his policies, but if you’re even the littlest bit connected to reality you should be able to go “Yeeah, dial it back some. That’s not going to happen.”
Most people aren’t willing to call out their own political allies, no matter how crazy/dumb. I understand that. Most conservative posters here have been pretty silent in threads where moonshot is shitting himself. I’m just pointing out you’re the only asshole here who’s enough of a partisan troll to say that’s not feces but potpourri. You yourself have said you’re not here for rational debate, so own it.
Romney will win in a landslide
What if 538 is right, and Romney loses by 60+ electoral votes View Single Post"
Interesting, but too bad it has no relation to a single one of my posts-- especially since I’ve never said Romney would win in a landslide. I mean, really. Show me where I said he’d get near 400 EV’s.
Those posts don’t reference moonshot, but you can clearly see that I’ve never said-- nor insinuated-- that Romney would win in a landslide. Therefore, this matter should be settled (though I fear it will not be).