Maybe I shall; but I would still prefer to present alternatives to the current choices.
I agree that the Seer shouldn’t say anything at the moment but what if the Seer had found a Wolf, should they keep quiet about it altogether or wait until near EOD for the reveal.
If you found out that you were the Doc, could your actions also be redirected to someone other than the one you targeted?
Yes, doctor actions could possibly be redirected as well. If you are a seer I would not out yourself today, I would wait at least one more game day before revealing. Having say, 3 live peeks would be awesomely helpful for the village. Trading the seer to clear one player or to catch one wolf isn’t really worth the tradeoff, imo.
Time for bed
I am not actually claiming anything 
I am just asking questions and trying to keep up.
most of, not all, the games over here scum have to pick one team mate to do the NK. and in doing so said Nightkiller foregoes their additional power, if they have one.
i don’t agree one bit. if atpg is a vig of some sort then leaving him alive in this game is tantamount to giving scum another NK. that be nein gut in my book. and fuck if he is a vig and scum do have a redirector the last thing we want to do is let him “use his power again”.
and i am going to go back to yesterDay for just a moment. something that is particulariy fascinating about this board and the other ones that we typically frequent is that when a wolf gets caught with their hand in the cookie jar and they don’t get punished for it is that will typically shut down. i’ve been scum with many mates before that have gotten a modicum of heat and my advice is “just shut the fuck up and stoopid town will latch on to someone else”. crud i use that strategy myself.
vote giraffe
Heh, peeker sees just how dangerous my role is. Nice.
can we call you sybil from here on out. first you are another vig then you may or may not be then you are certain you are. then vigs are cool unless they are like killing a whole pisspot of town even though you are more likely to “kill our good guys than hit bad guys” you’ve encountered them when they “killed nothing but scumbags and wiped the floor with the scums”.
fuck the sun will either rise in the east tomorrow or maybe the west and probably not the north or south but maybe.
plus you fucking kind of agree with me.
jeebuz, that’s all sides of messed up.
I *may *be a vigilante, I may not be. Depends on how many other people targeted Mahaloth. I will however assume I’m a vigilante until proven otherwise by my death. Vigs are cool, they’re the most powerful townie role there is, really. That said, they’re so powerful that without guidance or luck they can destroy half their own teammates.
I believe in the vigilante. It’s an excellent role, and it’s balanced in and of itself because of the risks involved. A double-edged sword for the town to use to defend or destroy itself.
I’ve been a vigilante and hit nothing but scums in a game and survived; I’ve been vigilante and hit townie after townie. But a vigilante is simply a second lynch, controlled by one vote, and that vote is townie.
Is it unusual for people to agree with you?
and for anyone that reads current stuff. i think pizzawithpepperoniandmushroomsandextracheese is possibly my shooter.
it happened once. but it had to do with a sea dive into maryanne’s trench.
if anyone else gets that reference i may fall over and fucking pass out.
I’m your shooter?
Don’t turn your back on me. Listen, this is Shooter’s tour. I worked hard, paid my dues, now it’s Shooter’s turn. Shooter won’t let his reign at the top be spoiled by some peeker.
- participation, as mentioned I am traveling at the moment, will be back later today. Apologies. I am catching up whilst sat on my thumbs at IAH for the next 3 hrs. At least the coffee here is decent.
- day one vote. This is my first game after an 18 month break. Scum hunting techniques may have advanced significantly in the interim, but it was my experience that day one lynches were a crapshoot and there were generally no good reasons for the lynch, which is why I said day one lynches are for horrible reasons. When I looked through day one, my vote was the least horrible choice of many horrible choices. I also believe it is important to have a vote on record, rather than no vote.
NAF jumped in at post 774 to note that my vote was “double fuck scummy” but didnt switch his vote to me. So apparently he felt his case against PeekerCpa (need to double check, on tapatalk, so scrolling isnt possible) was stronger.
If I were of a suspicious mind I would say he was happy with the top lynch targets, and decided not rock the boat and get things setup for a PCM lynch today.
actually i was thinking more along these lines. i am, of course the johnny depp character.
if you have ever read the gunslinger by king you get my frustration. don’t think around corners very well. natural inclination is just to blaze away. sometimes you have to take a couple of innocents out to get the bad guys. i still think giraffe is scum. crud ben could justify a vote just based on the wiffle waffle votes from yesterDay but that seems too easy. don’t know what happened to mykbot. maybe i pissed him off like quacked. i also get very nervous about anyone coming to my defense. typically only happens when i am town and they are scum. so hmms go out to draino and sis just because i am the default lynch around these parts. and crud then they get to go, toldya. so i kind of get a fakepeek of town from naf. sliver is a question. don’t think i ever played with her. but she jumps in feet first on the words of some of my most hated enemies kind of like it is gospel. and then uses my “change” in playstyle midway through the Day after her fucking vote to justify her first vote base on my “change” in playstyle. gotta say kind of fucking odd.
I’m skimming/catching up. This weekend is busy for me, so I probably won’t kick back into high gear until Monday. I see that:
- I’ve apparently been peeked by Idle Thoughts. I’d like to know if just my affiliation was revealed to him, or my entire role. Obv if it’s my whole role don’t announce what it is, but I’d like to know if you got it.
- Askthepizzaguy claimed vig for pretty much no reason, which I find extremely irritating.
- Crackedquads thinks there can be a redirector, but there can’t be because a redirector would have to submit two names each night for their action (the person whose action is being redirected, and the recipient). So no.
- Silman death probably means some POG wolves, unless we know that kill was made by a neutral third party. Do we know if the death writeups occur in any particular order?
I’m going back to bed.
I subbed in for Hirka overNight, and I’m finally all caught up.
For now, I’m going to put down a vote on gnarly charlie, for posting 95% fluff, and this vote on Texcat:
That extra sentence about her vote on lilflower feels tacked on to me, like he has a weak case, and wants to bolster it. OMGUS might be a weak reason to vote someone, but I don’t see how it’s a scummy one.
vote gnarlycharlie.
And that’s my point exactly.
If someone ever guesses wrong (and attributes a fakepeek of “Villager” to a Wolf), what’s to stop scum from killing the fakepeeker…just so you’ll think the Wolf is soft-cleared?
That is a huge flaw in your logic and you have yet to answer it.
For all you know, that could have happened here. As I already pointed out, it was talked about earlier (before Sitnam died). So scum obviously already knows about that tactic/gameplay strategy.
Thus my point: I wouldn’t put too much faith in it from here on (or ever). : p
Huh?
I have no idea what you’re talking about. You either have me confused with someone else or you’re mixing what I said toDay.
I never received anything about Peekercpa (nor did I say I did). If you think I did, then please show me the post.
TODAY, however, I got a notice from Gad about Dancecat. Are you just mixing the two up or what, because this confuses the hell out of me.
As for the Krayz vote…I based it on the fact that he was generally being anti-Town and that even his friends from the other board admitted his gameplay was off and not as it usually is. Maybe not the strongest case, but as far as I was concerned, it was a better case than I, personally, had on anyone else at the time.
As I said earlier, it was just the alignment.
You should probably stick to your own gut in who you choose for Vigging suspects, Pizzaguy. If I were a Vig, I’d probably target those who are less posting and laying low, so they wouldn’t have to be dealt with later (I’ve played in games were the people who posted less eventually came under suspicion and it sucks when half the people want to lynch them and half the people want to wait for the person to come back and post more or defend themselves…holds up the whole game). But also because I feel that scum would be more likely found in those places than not.