Mystery Mafia -- Game Thread

:smack: THANK YOU.

It’s about bloody time.

Should happen simultaneously. There’s no in-game difference between a vig and a murder, usually.

I think it would be good if you explained to us what the POG expectations would be for this game. I wasn’t expecting more than one Vigilante. I don’t think we have ever had more than one Vigilante.

But even if you go 1 for 3, that is most likely a net positive for Town. In a typical setup (not counting nightkills) a ratio of 1 scum to every 3 town (25%) makes for a reasonable balance where the number of correct lynches needed by Town to win equals the number of mislynches the scum need to win.
Throw in a Vigilante and if that vigilante kills 4 people, 1 scum and 3 town, the net effect is even. Even if the original make up is different (not 25%) the general dynamic is still the same. A Vig who kills 1 scum out of every 4 kills (or less) is doing okay. If it takes more than 4 then the Vig is hurting the Town, but you’ve already got Mahaloth (doubled up, but whatever) so we’re already ahead.
Also, it is my strong belief that vigilantes provide the additional service of eliminating unknowns. By killing off a player under suspicion, you remove the need for town to lynch that player. Whether scum or Town, that is a net positive for Town.
I’m of the opinion that the correct Town move would have been to stay silent.

I agree with this point of view. Otherwise, roles like tracker, watcher, and role blocker are significantly reduced in power.

From the OP:

It’s a bit ambiguous on this point.
Typically we use verbiage like ‘You get a team night kill every night and must select one member to perform the action,’ which isn’t there.

If this is how things a typically done on the other board, then cracked quads is probably correct.

<snipped>

and i am breaking this up so it ain’t one big honking post. if you don’t like it kiss my ass.

first. how the fuck do you get OMGYS when i was the first to put it down? for fuck’s sake. at least let it be clear that i voted for your because i thought you were scum. you can characterize it however the fuck you want but that does not make it so. oh, unless we are pulling the same oh shit they are scum, vote. oh i see someone says they are not scum unvote nonsense.

how the fuck would it be out of character for moi to call you on weak sauce? fuck. g i am going to hop all over inconsistent shit. especially if it results in a butt hurt that creates a vote. crap that’s where i find scum (patent pending on this bitch). you behaved exactly as i would expect a scum giraffe to behave. “you are an idiot so i’ll just vote you”. weak sauce.

hey the rest of you fucking idiots. can we lynch giraffe and be done with this fucking nonsense?

kind of fucking figure cricketts will be my refrain.

heh heh. what a fucking idiot. i don’t bet the house unless i know i get a lake place to add to the beach, mountain and just kind of knocking around joint. the one in scotland is off the board, however.

i’m kind of waiting for sach to implode at some point.

I will review giraffe’s posts, but I make no promises that I’ll agree with you peeker.

and i once again counsel that all that is said in thread stays in thread. i actually tolerate some of you personally but when it comes to this game that’s a different beast.

and not to be mean giraffe you really think i have endeared myself to enough folks that they would want to save my ass? i mean stop smoking whatever the hell it is because it will kill you.

Sheesh Peeker you do go a bit OTT (OVER THE TOP) but I am no longer sure you are scum, very abrasive, yes, crude, yes but a scum??? I have no fucking idea.

Underlining mine :slight_smile:

I get OMGUS because you have gone apeshit on me ever since I put that vote down on you. The stated reasons for your initial vote on me were ostensibly straightforward scum-hunting (but which I personally found off based on my past experience with you), but your follow-up passion has not been based on any concrete arguments that I can see besides outrage that I could possibly think you were scum and vote for you. Put yourself in a Town player’s shoes: why would you expect someone to give a player pass for something they find scummy? A Town peeker would go apeshit about that, not about putting down a vote.
[/QUOTE]

I’m okay so far. I like puzzles. And this one should be a pretty good one as long as all that junk about shifting powers is not true. Of the 4 dead, there seems to be no evidence of wacky powers that would be confusing to decipher due to a changing nature.

And I’ll more likely explode than implode.

Here’s the thing: I don’t think you’re betting the house at all. I think you’d see those silly posts in follow-up games as a minor annoyance at worst and a badge of honor of your creativity as a scum player at best.

I mean, really, are you expecting us to believe you suddenly give a shit about what comes flying out of your mouth? :stuck_out_tongue:

i kind of wish i was a mouse on the scum board. worry worry oh fuck giraffe is absolutely fucked. worrry worry let him go on the offensive. worry worry but he has no chance against peek worry worry well he’s fucked then.

ok, tis funny. the wanton ramblings of a confirmed scum, but still funny.

hey, who are my scumbuddies giraffe. since you are so sure i am one obviously i am providing cover for some others. or potentially stirring the shit on townies. how do you see it?

you always ask that question of scum and see how long it takes for them to come up with bullshit. dontyaknow.

Unless I misread, are you confirming yourself as scum? Or are you just being obnoxious?

and i can see why this game plays differently on the other board. over there you would already be fucked oh long necked one. here you have about a minute or so.

really? i mean seriousl?