Let’s see how this looks, shall we?
Esprix
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
Let’s try it the other way 'round
Esprix
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
I like it the first way better. In the second one, it kinda looks like you want people to “Ask the Gay Guy” about being stupid rather than malicious.
Just MHO of course.
Ooo, I was looking at framing, not context. Hmmm, I suppose It could be cause and effect - the first one is “Ask the Gay Guy, and you’ll say something stupid,” the second is “Want to say something stupid? Ask the Gay Guy!” I suppose out of the two options, the first is better! 
Let me try something first…
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
How’s this? Does it differentiate between the two ideas enough?
(Thanks for the input, Manhattan. I’m coming to visit your name this weekend. :D)
Esprix
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
Yes. That way works best.
And if you’re going to be in the Apple this weekend, you should join the NYC-area Dopers for Dinner .
NYC IRL III
is on April 15th. Do you have what it takes?
Alas, Saturday night I’ll be partying it up in the Hamptons, and Friday night I’ll be partying it up in Manhattan. I was supposed to be partying it up tonight, but plans fizzled. 
Sorry I’ll miss it. Send my regrets!
Esprix
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
Esprix, the way I read your sig was “if you want an explanation from someone stupid, ask the gay guy.” 
Yoink! Good thing I changed it!
Now I’ve added a space for when Wally gets around to gracing me with a sig
Esprix
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
{This space reserved for a Genuine WallyM7 Sig™}
Just testing a sig line…
“I was not making fun of you personally; I was heaping scorn on an inexcusably silly idea – a practice I shall always follow.”
-Robert A. Heinlein
test
[image]http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif[/image]
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
![http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif[/image]](http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif%5B/image%5D){kind=link}
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Sig Test
http://members.aol.com/ljgrafix/rainbow.gif
“I don’t want realism. I want magic!” - Blanche DuBois
Love that rainbow smilie!
Now, is my sig as it stands too long? Manhattan? Cajun?
(Or is this akin to, “Does this dress make me look fat?” :D)
Esprix
Ask the Gay Guy! (or, if you prefer the Jesusfied version, Asketh the damn Priest Guy!)
“Never assume a malicious intent when stupidity will explain just as well.”
{This space reserved for a Genuine WallyM7 Sig™}