So my organization just moved an engineer to my work area last week. While he’s actually a very good civil engineer, he reportedly had issues getting along with others, so he was relocated to our area.
I’ve actually known him for years, but have only talked to him in passing up until now. This afternoon he stopped by my cubicle to rant about the education system in the U.S. (He thinks people have been getting “dumber” over time, especially since the 1950s, which is when America was “great.” (“Uh-oh,” I thought to myself.)
Since he’s moved down here, he’s also often told me how smart he is. He took an online IQ test the other day that proves this. He scored a 155, and was “particularly gifted in spatial analysis.” He is very good at math (he reports), and took math courses in college up to matrix theory, obtaining a minor in math in addition to his engineering major. This was a prelude to him telling me that he was fighting with his children’s teachers about how to teach math. Last year he apparently pulled his kids out of public school after an argument with the school principal, so his kids are now in private school.
Anyway, after ranting about the state of the education system this afternoon, I get an earful of his beliefs. He does not believe the dominant long range force in the universe is gravity. Instead, it is electromagnetism. Gravity is a short range force created by the Earth’s atmosphere. What about the Moon, with no atmosphere, I stupidly ask? More gibberish resulted from this question, including something about the Moon “ringing like a bell” during the Apollo missions.
He also believes that cosmic rays somehow affect the Earth’s core, which somehow affects continental drift… “You mean plate tectonics,” I ask? “No, that’s a myth.” …to the Earth being smaller in the past, and that’s why the continents were close together in the past (not because they actually moved; it’s because the Earth expanded), to the Earth’s rotation being affected, which is why the climate has changed in the past…
…and the climate, of course, has nothing to do with the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air (which is actually highest right before an ice age, he says), and of course global warming is a myth.
He also believes in antigravity, and how it has something to do with experiments by the Germans before WWII with mercury. Oh, and Tesla – he was a genius, and all of his ideas for free energy and free energy transmission were hidden by the oil tycoons who bought up his patents… Oh, and speaking of oil and fossil fuels, it is being continuously produced by cosmic rays (OK, we’re back to cosmic rays, again?) which he seems to have confused with neutrinos. I made the mistake of pulling up the Wikipedia article on cosmic rays (because I remembered they were charged particles, not electrically neutral like neutrinos are, but couldn’t remember exactly what kind of charged particles they are), and he had a conniption, because “anybody can edit those articles.” “Yes,” I replied, “but they also have references, like the first reference in the cosmic ray article, which references a physics textbook.” I then get an earful about how bad textbooks are today.
“You know none of this is supported by any mainstream scientists or universities,” I say. “That’s not true!,” he replied. “Just look at these videos on the internet!” :rolleyes:
I finally couldn’t take it any more. I told him these all sound like whack-jobs ideas with no basis in reality, and to not believe everything he finds on the internet. Then I told him I needed to get back to work.
“We’ll argue some more another time,” he promised. “But you’ll never convince me I’m wrong!” :smack:
Great. I have to work with this guy now? :mad: