So they are at the Renaissance Spain level now, next they are going to start with the auto de fés to root out the insufficiently american and other undesirables.
Arggggh. This trope is one of my SDMB pet peeves. They didn’t misspell anything They just didn’t use the word choice you preferred.
“Their” and “There” and “They’re” are often mistaken for each other because they look and sound similar. “Introduces” and “virtue signals” and “fellates” do not resemble each other. Just say “You should have said” instead of “You misspelled.”
I agree with you it’s silly. That’s kind of the point, I guess, as it’s a joke. I suppose one might see it akin to that nonsense the pubbies are posting on ther Xitter accounts, “My pronouns are ‘kiss my ass’”. But the difference is those using the “misspelled” trope are making a joke; those dumbasses using the “my pronouns” one are just stupid.
I agree that the “you misspelled [whatever]” thing is tiresome, whether or not it’s a deliberate joke. (Oddly enough, people manage to refrain from posting out genuine misspellings, like their, there and they’re. Or payed rather than paid.)
Do you not understand how jokes work? It may be an overused joke by now, but that’s the whole point of the silly joke. The (ludicrous) notion that it is misspelling rather than different word choice. That they did intend to write “Congressman fellates Trump” but made fifteen spelling mistakes and inadvertently wrote “Congressman introduces bill”.
Not buying what you’re selling. If somebody said “Uniformed officers arrive at the scene” and somebody else said “You misspelled ‘uninformed,’” that would work because the two words resemble each other AND the corrected word is funny and more truthful. People here at the SDMB are assumed to be too smart to mistake obviously different words for each other.
Yes I understand it’s a joke. I understand it’s a BAD joke.
But obviously you don’t understand how jokes work, when the criticism you are doubling down on is analogous to “that’s a ridiculous way to screw in a light bulb, that would never work”.
A certain amount of tired cliché in-jokes are a welcome rhetorical seasoning that provides a sense of community and continuity. It’s part of our house style as a literary publisher. And, yes, eventually each and every one gets too old and too tired then falls by the wayside.
We don’t often encounter “Hi Opal” or “1920s-style death ray” or “once for 20 minutes” these days. Those got too tired and have been retired by common usage, not by executive fiat.
Evidently some people think “you misspelled” is too tired to use. Equally evidently, that is still a distinctly minority viewpoint since that cliché is used at least daily around here by a long list of somebodies. Myself sometimes included.
One can choose to be irked, or choose to just eyeroll and move on. What IMO one can’t do is demand others change their habits. Or at least they can’t do that without encountering annoyed pushback.
Aside from the live-and-let-live aspect, the advantage of the eyeroll approach over the irked lecture approach is that you don’t risk revealing that apparently you never understood the joke the in the first place.