And if Trump understood any of that, all he’d do is write an EO declaring that all US wine* is officially Champagne, and that anyone who argues with the notion that this is the only real Champagne in the world is now subject to 1000% tariffs.
*Yes, all of it, including stuff like Thunderbird.
Maybe you know this, maybe you don’t but bourbon can be produced in all 50 states, Puerto Rico and DC. But it DOES have to be made in the US. It has to be from at least 51% corn, aged in new, charred oak barrels, no more than 160 proof and some other rules. But it is entirely possible to have bourbon from Alaska, Hawaii or Minnesota. Bottled in bond has specific rules as does straight bourbon.
The alcohol bourbon is named after Bourbon County Kentucky and/or Bourbon Street New Orleans, both of which are named for the Bourbon royal family originally of the Bourbonnais region of France.
The cookies/biscuits, although British, appear to be named after either the French royals or the New Orleans connection (given they were originally named “Creola”) or possibly both. Sadly, they are not alcoholic.
But you seem unwilling to acknowledge the assymetry here. There are lots of products that are region-limited. Why is it crazy for champagne to be one of them but not bourbon?