I believe this has always been possible…albeit implemented in a different way: via the inclusion of the ‘Automatically parse links in text’ checkbox underneath the compose new thread area.
I’ve posted NSFW links in the past with automatic parsing disabled and not run into any problems. The point of the rule is to prevent people from accidentally clicking on something that they shouldn’t be looking at at work, so my guess is that noparse tags will be fine. But of course, you should wait for an actual moderator’s opinion.
Here’s the thing: When you link to something that’s potentially unsafe for work, something that could get someone in trouble if they clicked on it by mistake, you need to be considerate.
You mention at the same time you make the link that it’s NOT SAFE FOR WORK. If’s nice if you say why, like “adult content.” Or “Mature material.” Or “Sexual situations.” Or “violence.” Or whatever.
The link must be displayed in such a way that it takes at least two clicks to get there. To quote from the Rules:
So does noparse help you here? I believe all it does is keep a link from being copied when quoted – and I’m not even sure that works so well if the above example is any indication; you must unclick the box that says “parse links” each and every time you use it and do it again if you preview.
noparse prevents the message board software from doing any processing on the text between the tags. So I can type [noparse][noparse]a link or ;)[/noparse][/noparse] and it comes out with [noparse]a link or ;)[/noparse] instead of the usual a link or ;). URLs inside a noparse block will never be automatically turned into links, even if they’re quoted.
That’s a helpful thing . . . but even so I don’t think it takes away the need for people to identify potentially dangerous links. It doesn’t do away with the “two-click” rule afaic.
I’d hate to see someone get reprimanded or lose their job because of something they clicked on without full understanding of what they were getting into. It’s incumbent upon the person leaving the link to fully identify such potential problems.
It wouldn’t be a problem if people weren’t posting on messageboards from work… Just saying.
FTR, I support the “Two-Click” rule so people aren’t accidentally exposed to things they might not want to see, regardless of where they are posting from.
I guess I’m still confused. When you say “Two Click” I assume you mean that a hyperlink can’t go straight to NSFW material. But it appears to me that the new No Parse tag permanently prevents the text from becoming a hyperlink so that the URL must be manually copied and pasted into the address bar. Does that count as “Two Clicks”? (I see it as like the “break your link with spaces” ruling being used in that ongoing Doper picture thread)
Obviously, in either case tagging your link NSFW is just polite (as well as being required).
Surely breaking a link (whether by “noparse” or any other means) is as good as following the two click rule. The whole point was to prevent someone from accidentally viewing NSFW material.
If someone posts a broken link and labels it not safe for work, also requiring that the URL not directly lead to NSFW material would be redundant.