When do the Bears not need a quarterback?
When teams do those choreographed, group photo ops in the end zone after a big play, have any of them done The Last Supper, yet? Would that be a penalty for too many men on the field?
Maybe since Sid Luckman? 
That said, Bears management has been very much (at least publicly) behind Fields as their QB. OTOH, while he’s been very dangerous running the ball, he hasn’t been particularly effective as a passer.
Here’s me from the NFL Pre-season thread:
Good news: I was right!
Bad news: I was right!
Howell has been pretty good for the Commanders today. Webb for the Giants? Not awful, but probably not a roster stick.
Upright blocks the Seahawks field goal at the end of regulation. Needs to go to OT.
ETA: 'Hawks get the ball first. Go Geno!
I don’t blame Myers, it was almost blocked. And he still got it very close.
And the Hawks get the pick. Seahawks defense has been the MVP of this game since the second play.
Off that pick they drive down and make a short FG, this one down the middle.
Seattle wins and suddenly every Hawks fan is also a Lions fan for the evening,
I’ve never been so happy to be so wrong.
I’m annoyed.
Colts lose and Broncos win, meaning that at the last moment Seattle loses its 3rd spot in the draft, and have the 4th pick.
Rats! 
Lost in the shuffle was the fact that Miami scored a safety on the last play of the game when the Jets were desperately tossing laterals until the ball finally dribbled out of their own end zone. That made the final score 11-6, which I was certain was a scoragami. But, alas, that score actually happened once before. It was in the NFC Championship game on 1/23/2000, when the St. Louis Rams defeated Tampa Bay 11-6.
The Cowboys decided to treat this as a preseason game, apparently. If they lay an egg like this next week in Tampa, Mike McCarthy may need to update his resume.
So, is that considered an anti-scorigami; a score that was unique, and now is not?
First place NFC!!! Whoooooo! 
I don’t know the answer to that question.
A scorigami can only occur once. Once it happens, that particular score can never again be a scorigami. So perhaps when it happens for the second time, it is indeed an anti-scorigami.
The Bills finished the season winning their last 8 games, while the Bengals won their last 7. (Obviously, one or both of those streaks would have ended had they been able to complete their game last week.)
The Jags and Chiefs both won their last 5 games. So all the AFC division winners come into the playoffs on hot streaks.
NFL channel showed an interesting stat about the Dolphins this year. They won their first 3, then lost their next 3. They won their next 5, then lost their next 5. And then won their last game to sneak into the playoffs.
The Titans were at one point 7-3 and had the best record in the conference. They then lost their last 7 games. The Colts also lost their last 7 games, while the Jets lost their last 6.
The Niners are the hottest team in the NFL, having won their last 10 games. The Bears lost their last 10 games and earned the top pick in the draft.
If the Packers win tonight, they will finish on a 5-game winning streak and make the playoffs.
What, exactly, is the definition of “scorigami”? Is it a score which has only occurred once in the NFL, or is it the act of finishing a game with a score that has never happened before?
Cowboys have not won a road playoff game since January 1993, time for that shameful streak to end