Will add just one more point- no one is letting anyone “off the hook”- dont the CT’s agree OBL was involved, just that the US was ok with the deed? That to me adds culpability to more people without taking any away.
And Cisco, here’s a theory for you- the US was aware of the plan and did nothing to stop it because they felt that it occurring would help their cause- please definitifvely disprove this was the case.
Once again: If you can explain to me how NightRabbit’s direct quotes can be interpreted to mean that she is allowing for the possibility of incompetence or mistake as the explanation, I’ll concede your point. This general statement and comparison to coin tossing does not address her specific comments.
OK, fine. I agree that she is a deluded conspiracy theorist. Now what do you think of post 155?
Also kind of ironic that you call me a chickenshit when you completely ignored post #152.
No, not all of them believe OBL was involved, and in fact some of them posit that OBL and Al Qaeda are myths.
Do you understand burden of proof at all?
Wee Bairn, here’s a theory for you- A little teacup is orbiting the sun between Earth and Mars, but it’s too small to be detected by current technology- please definitively disprove this is the case.
Edit: Most of them - including, I believe, the sites NR linked to - do not believe any mulsims were involved in 9/11. Most of them do believe, however, that jews were involved.
So, whats the real story here? What is really going on?
Is all this exaggerated bile a devious plot to make Nightrabbit cry, a plot devised upon the ancient knowledge that if you add even one of Nightrabbit’s tears to a cadburys creme egg then it will grow into the fabled monster creme egg, with a really think chocolate shell and filled to the brim with tasty gooey white stuff??? Is that it?
Because I still havent seen anything else that justifies all the self-rightious wailing and gnashing of teeth in this thread.
Actually, post 152 completely confirms my point. Of course, I’m not going to address it as I have no intention of defending conspiracy theories, pretty much no one in this thread is. But there you are, battling away.
So tell me again why you feel like an insulted relation to a Dahmer victim?
Are you trying to get me to say none of my friends or family died on 9/11? Because they didn’t. I fail to see how that’s relevant.
It’s relevant because of your [post=9632035]stupid fucking analogy[/post] a page back that you used to explain your outrage. Got short term memory problems?
Uhh, no. The analogy applies and makes sense. I’m sorry you can’t grasp it.
Look, CarnalK, we get it. You’re not offended. Great. I am. So why don’t you be the nice, calm, rational guy you’re claiming to be and fuck off, 'kay?
Cause some of us are trying to figure out why someone would get their knickers in such a twist over something that did not affect them personally, seven years after it happened.
NR yes linked to those sites but I don’t think said everything on all of the sites was her opinion as well, and has since acknowledged a lapse in judgement for linking them. But that’s not enough for you, you want what, a hand written apology to you and every relative of everyone who died that day, and her promise to dedicate her life to fighting the CT people?
Most people, even the victims families, have moved on- you should too. And one nitpick, the fireman lost coworkers, not brothers.
What’s to grasp? People asked why you are so offended and you said “How would you feel if it was YOUR family!? What if they were making money off it!?”. Both of which are bullshit points in this case. STFU, already.
One can express any opinion one wants but don’t be surprised when any opinion that is willfully ignorant gets challenged.
Well then. I’m sorry I got suckered into arguing with you. I assure you that mistake has been officially rectified as of now.
I explained this rather thoroughly in 152. You haven’t done anything to explain why it’s bullshit except call it so. And I’m a chickenshit internet warrior? Yeah, whatever, douche :rolleyes:.
How about this- no one, not even the CT guys, doubt that a plane hit the buildings, causing them to fall, and causing people to die. How does questioning the events that lead to these topplings and deaths take away or denigrate the memory of anyone who died there?
Apparently you haven’t encountered those who believe it was all done with holograms, TV fakery, controlled demolition, and/or orbital death rays.
No planes
Bombs in the buildings
Shut the fuck up while you’re behind, Wee Bairn. You’re woefully ignorant on the topic and apparently arguing for fun. You’re also painting yourself quite the callous asshole.
Sorry, by the way, for re-negging on 174 but I couldn’t let that slide.
I was unaware there are people who feel the whole thing was computer trickery, for that I apologize. But that’s not really relevant, you are pitting someone who simply “has doubts” about the official version, not one of the more extreme conspiricists.
If I pulled all of your posts on this thread and the other and all of NR’s and asked people off the street to read them and decide who the lunatic was, my money’s on you by a landslide.
And telling everyone who doesn’t agree with you to shut up and fuck off and go away may work in real life if you’re a badass, but loses a bit of the intimadation factor on the internet- we can’t see how scary you really are. All you have to do is quit posting dumb rantings and the responses will stop as well.
And why couldn’t there have been planes AND bombs in the buildings as well?
:rolleyes: Why can’t everything just be everything and we’ll get rid of facts and truth and science and knowledge and no one will know anything and Jennifer Lopez shot JFK, Mother Theresa stormed the beach at Normandy and Jesus was the butthole son of Genghis Kahn.