Besides, doesn’t love the sinner, hate the sin apply to anything?
I mean, how I understood it was when my mother would say, “You know, I love you. I may not always like what you do, but that doesn’t mean I don’t love you.”
I mean, I may disagree with some people here on their political views, but I still like them as people. Would that count?
Racincikki said, “I’m sorry you’ve had to deal with so many assholes who happened to be Christian. I still think you’re wrong in general.” Jarbaby said, “I read your other posts and your evidence for this amazing stat was due to personal experience and anecdotes. Certainly then, you’ll take my anecdotal evidence to the contrary.”
So, yeah, I’m feeling blown off.
You’re sore about the Ashcroft/Polycarp comparison? I FUCKING RETRACT IT!!!
Call it “population sampling.” But, no matter, my experiences don’t count. Yosemitebabe, do you think your anger and hate for me make me rethink my ideas of Christian love? Do you think you’re fufilling the words of Jesus?
If it makes you happy, I’m crying right now. I would have liked to have been accepted by the church, and not to be hated. I hate it that my sister won’t have any contact with me because of her love for Jesus. I hate the constant feeling of rejection.
You wrote, “Oh good grief. What melodrama.” No, it’s honest emotion, deep feelings I didn’t even know I had until now.
So pateyourself on the back, Yosemitebabe. Mission accomplished.
I wasn’t blowing you off. I am truly sorry you’ve had to deal with it. HOWEVER, I continue to disagree with you. If you want to think that’s “blowing you off,” well, I’m sorry. Again.
WHAT, pray tell, did she mean by that? Did she mean that you were wrong about your personal experiences? That you didn’t experience them? Now, that wouldn’t make much sense, would it? Since she says she’s sorry that you’ve had to deal with such assholes.
More than likely she thinks you are WRONG about is your claim that 90% of ALL Christians in the USA are assholes. How many times do I have to make this point? That’s the broad brush you are painting. None of us want to take anything away from the pain you’ve endured. We just don’t think that it proves that 90% of ALL Christians are assholes. That’s all.
And what exactly is in there that is saying that your feelings or experiences don’t count? You put forth your personal feeling as “evidence” that 90% of ALL Christians in the USA are assholes. Jarbaby puts forth her personal experiences as “evidence” to the contrary. What do you want? For her experiences to mean nothing? And how exactly is she dismissing YOUR experiences by relating her own?
No, you were missing the entire point that they were trying to make.
Fine. And what a gracious job you’ve done of it too.
No, they count. Just like jarbaby’s experiences count. Or mine, or Jodi’s, or racinchicki’s. What? Do you think your experiences count more? I am not sure what your point is.
Oh man, that sucks. None of us doubt that you’ve suffered terrible pain. None of us want to belittle that. But your considerable pain does not mean that 90% of the entire US Christian population are assholes. I don’t think you should be so upset that we don’t buy that. We are entitled to not buy that.
I can appreciate that you have deep feelings. I don’t wish to dismiss them. But don’t you see, that you are dismissing everyone else’s feelings, when you paint with such a broad brush?
And, the “melodrama” you express was your basic attitude of “fine, I won’t post here anymore” when people started to disagree with you. That’s melodrama. Not your feelings, or your pain.
Wha…? Where did you get the message that I hate you? You are one of my favorites. I am at a loss here.
What is this? Do you think that everyone who takes exception with a broad-brush claim you make hates you?
Obviously this is a highly emotional issue for you. I wish you no pain. But you must realize - most of us won’t let a broad brush statement - like the one you made here - go without disagreeing and discussing it. Why did you expect any different?
Ah yes, Libertarian is engaging full force in the traditional ‘no true scotsmen’ fallacy that certain christians so love. So, lib, your assertion is that real christians should be ‘good people’, and that any christians who are not ‘good people’ are not really christians? Boy, that’s just swell… oh, wait, how can I tell who the good christians are before they go bad? Why should I take your word for the correct interpretation of a self-contradictory religious work when there are all of these other people who can make just as reasonable an argument for a different one?
Here are some statistics on views toward homosexuality stratified by type of Christian faith. To add my two cents, I’m rather stunned by how many Christians thought that homosexual relations should be illegal and/or found homosexuality to be an unacceptable lifestyle.
What is sad is that the historical period of the New Testament was not exactly known for being peaceful. People can claim “No Jesus, No Peace,” but unfortunately even when Jesus was here, there was little peace.
So, 1,003 Christians (according to this poll) were interviewed.
42% of these 1,003 Christians said homosexuality should not be legal. Yes, I am shocked by the high number as well.
But, even if we all take this poll of 1,003 people as a truly accurate representation of ALL Christians in America (which I am quite ambivalent about at this point) then that means that 58% of these people either had no problem with homosexual acts being legal, or had no opinion. 42% is too high, but it ain’t 90%, is it?
Actually a ratio of 1:10 would mean that 91% were assholes.
But I digress.
I’m sorry Jar, but there is a big - nay HUGE - difference between “no Jesus, no peace” and “know Jesus, know peace”. The former implies that without Jesus there can be no peace, the latter implies that Jesus is one possible path to peace.
So I have a big problem with the slogan that is the title of this thread. It is, in essence, stating that anyone who does not take this 2000 year old story as the absolute truth is doomed to violence, immorality, you name it. It is not possible for them to be peaceful.
I would expect any Christian who does not want to identify themselves as being within that apocryphal 91% to reject it immediately and utterly.
On the contrary, the confrontations are there. Maybe it’s time you paid more attention.
See, for example, God Loves Fags, a site where gay Christians monitor the activities of Phelps and others, and actively promote education and tolerance.
Thanks. I knew I had gotten the math wrong on that!
So do most of the rest of us. It’s one of those lame slogans that make me cringe. That’s why I don’t ever display such slogans on my car, nor do I wear cutesy “Christian” t-shirts. Barf. To say the least.
Well, Libertarian, that is a site maintained by Gay Christians. What I’m looking for is outspoken Straight Christians to confront their bigoted brothers. I know you’ll find several examples on this board. But I’m talking real life. I’ll acknowledge that the United Methodist Church is moving, slowly, towards greater acceptance. Other smaller demoninations already have better records on this issue (Unitarians and Quakers). But the largest demoninations influence more people and that is where change is necessary.
Actually, yosemitebabe, I think you’ve misread the statistics. The 1003 participants in the study included Christians, people of other faiths and atheists. This stat is telling:
Even in the traditionally forward moving Presbyterian sect, things are not improving much. For instance, the members of the church defeated, by a margin of almost 2-to-1, a proposal to allow oridination of gay ministers. Here’s the reaction from one “Renewal” group: