That’s standard for Churches of Christ. As I said, they aren’t really a denomination, they’re a doctrinal movement one of whose defining doctrines is that they are opposed to any denominational structure or association above the local congregation.
Dio, what I mean is that one meaning of “creature” is “specifically human animal” and that the remark in Mark, whichever word is used, is certainly meant to admonish believers to preach the gospel to all of humanity. It’s metonymy. Or synechoche. Or something else rhetorical.
And if my religion requires cleaning shoes? Still offensive, or is there in fact a qualitative difference between shoe-cleaning and shoe-pissing that makes your analogy a trough of piss? :dubious:
I agree with you. I just posted this to clarify this to those who keep posting doctrine for UCC and other church groups that don’t apply here.
Still not my problem. Clean your own shoes.
No qualitative difference, no. Basically, your religion is your problem. Leave me out of it.
Not that your own analogy is very apt. Proselytizing people is not doing anything for them. It’s just harrassment.
God, if only you would go.
My cats don’t choose to discuss religion with me. So long as they don’t try to convert me, it’s all good
In your cat’s world view; it is god.
Way to selectively quote there, cunt.
As I said:
Other Jews who were ALSO Christians:
- the Apostle Paul, a former member of the Sanhedrin.
- All of the original 12 Disciples;
- Every member of the early Christian church
It’s not like there’s some big rulebook being kept that says “Thou shalt not call thyself both Christian and Jew.” Unless you’re an atheist, religion is a subjective matter.
Heck you could throw in some old school Taoism and some uncertainty about the nature of g-d and be a theistic-agnostic Taoist Christian Jew.
This was directed at another poster, and definitely qualifies as an abusive remark. Don’t do this again
The new rules were posted on 2-24. You are warning (I assume, as there is no Moderator Note or Warning indication) Lizard for a post from 2-21.
I understood that the new rules were not to be retroactive. Is that an incorrect understanding?
Mr. Zotti, in this ATMB thread opened about 90 seconds ago, I express a concern about the above. If you would answer thereabousts, I’d be grateful. Merci!
The post on which **Ed Zotti **commented was made before the new rules took effect. Ed’s post is not an official warning and will not count against Lizard
Gfactor
Pit Moderator
No disrespect, Gfactor, but I’d rather see Ed say that. Along with an apology.
Yeah, I mean, what was the point? Ed is going to have his hands seriously full if he undertakes to go through all the Pit threads from the ancien regime cautioning everyone who ever directed an abusive remark at another poster.
Maybe Mother will let me post in the pit now…
I am sure you can. Cohens as well…
Yeah fuck Christians they suck, they should be strung up for every awkward attempt to relate that they might make.
God I hate those fucking worthless Christians, I wish they’d just shut the fuck up and not bother the rest of us!