I’m thankful for Charles M. Blow’s NYT article today…
I hope anyone that is interested, can read it with the paywall. Free trial, maybe? I hope I’m not breaking a rule with another quote…
Moved from Elections to MPSIMS.
[/moderating]
Fully agree. Trump is engaging in abuse behaviors by alternating praise and abuse, gaslighting, demanding respect while offering none, not taking responsibility, looking for scapegoats, etc.
America is stuck in an abusive relationship for the next 4-8 years. Treating this like it is normal is not going to help.
Bravo, Mr. Blow. I hope more people continue to stand up to Trump. The last thing this country needs is to “get along” with such an authoritarian demagogue. The more resistance he has, the better.
You can use incognito tabs to read it anyway. They don’t even mind that people do this, they’re just trying to add a layer of effort in order to encourage people to pay.
And Blow is probably wondering why the NYT is only down 95.7% of their net income from last year.
Holy crap, is that true? Wow.
Patient name Magiver shows telltale signs of intravenous Kool-Aid abuse. Flushed appearance, eyes black and dilated, smiling inappropriately, prone to loud outbursts and sudden fits of destructive rage.
“Gaslighting”?
Nobody says Charles Blow has to be nice to Trump.
But I remember how outraged liberals professed to be 8 years ago when Rush Limbaugh proclaimed that he hoped newly elected President Obama would fail.
Make up your minds- is it okay to declare war on a new Presudent or not? If it’s okay for Blow, why not for Limbaugh?
Because Trump deserves all the contempt and derision the US can throw at him and Obama did not. Blow’s comments about Trump are based on the fact that Trump is vile. Limbaugh’s were based on the fact that his party lost.
Obama didn’t win on the basis of blatant racism, bigotry, advocacy of war crimes and torture, and disregard of fundamental American values.
I’m sorry, what part of the [NYT](the NYT is only down 95.7% of their net income from last year)is down95.7% of their net income from last year did you not understand?
How about this: I hope that Trump’s stated agenda fails, because his stated agenda would do severe damage to this country and to the world. If, by some fluke, Trump changes his agenda to one that is constructive instead of destructive, then I hope that he succeeds in that new agenda.
I have no idea how accurate the DM, but you don’t appear to understand what you are reading. That article states their profits are down based on an accounting adjustment. It has nothing to do with the NYT’s popularity or not.
Well, hopefully like other upright citizens, I have purchased my guns and am stockpiling food for the coming civil war that Trump is going to start.
He didn’t win by lying to the public and circumventing the FOIA either. All of which was ignored during the election by the main stream media. Hillary would not have made it through the Primaries if Mr Blow Hard had done his job.
And you’re quoting a misleading stat.
Lack of profit is not the same as lack of income.
The NYT is not circling the drain like you’re trying to imply.
Total revenue is only slightly down.
Hell, even Trump has already abandoned his “stated agenda.” Front and center now is the big infrastructure plan whereby Trump can make even more millions and billions of dollars by [del]selling[/del] influencing contracts. Follow the money. That is the key to the Big D. Nothing else matters as much. If there are auxiliary benefits to the USA, it’s all good. But his own bottom line matters the most.