Yup. This is how NOT to resurrect an old argument.
I disagree… violently!
Underpants.
Where did you get your stats? I demand a cite!!
Wouldn’t it be ironic if the missing OP was yet another rant about the Board hamsters swallowing posts?
Damn, I guess the server did fuck up.
Eh, the point was, in a heated thread debating whether or not rape porn was irredeemable, some people insisted it was silly to believe there was even a possibility of real rape porn existing, a possibility I do not discount at all, especially given that Japan exists. Unfortunately, according to this article I may have been right: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20020626-9999_1n26wester.html
Of course, my own morals have to be questioned when what comes to mind reading this isn’t “oh my God” but “ha ha, ammunition.” Anyway, I really am NOT interested in starting the debate again- in fact, I am currently in an off-cycle on the board, and was just checking back to see if my thread went up or not- but I just wanted people to know that they may’ve been a bit too quick in scoffing. I realize this article or even the items in question aren’t proof of anything other than one man being sick, but think about it.
#1) No one said that there were no sickos who film their acts of murder and rape. Most of us were arguing that the hysteria about fake “rape”-porn on the internet was way overblown given the incredible scaricity of real rape porn. It was like arguing with someone who wanted all death scenes cut out of movies because somewhere, sometime, some sicko might have filmed a murder.
#2) Your article has really nothing to do with rape-porn anyway. If this guy is a rapist/murderer, there’s no evidence in the article that he filmed any of his crimes. Basically all that your article shows is that an alleged kiddie rapist/murderer liked looking at kiddie porn…scary “rape”-kiddie porn, but again, there’s no evidence yet that the disturbing “movies of what looked like girls screaming while being sexually assaulted.” are real or faked.
Fenris
Gee, if you can’t win an argument, just pull a strawman…
Nobody ever said that. You repeatedly said other people said it, but nobody ever did. What was said was that the vast, vast majority of it (Indeed, most likely every piece you’ll find on commercial sites) are not real. And the fact that, after all this time, you can only provide a single story that might involve real-rape “porn” (Just missing any details on wether it is real, or just looks real… And it’s child porn anyway, which is a completely different topic than regular “rape porn”) pretty much supports that.
And yeah, what Fenris said…
From the linked article:
(bolding mine)
Make your own jokes…