NotfooledbyW, You Colossal Clod

[DrDeth]

@Shodan

Now please - STOP IT!!!

Regards,
Shodan

You know, about a zillion people have asked you the same- about both your posts and esp your 'signature". But you continue…

[Frank]

@Ravenman

I bet you a bajillion dollars that he will eventually see this thread, and will attempt to debate what everyone has said point by point, …

Yes, with 17 quotes from 11 threads over the last three years. None of which will be relevant.

[dasmoocher]

@Ravenman

I bet you a bajillion dollars that he will eventually see this thread, and will attempt to debate what everyone has said point by point, rather than understand that we are only interested in telling him to go pound sand.

Or, he’ll claim this is evidence that all have failed and he is Winning!!! in Great Debates because no one can refute his brilliantly constructed and cited logical arguments in that forum.

Of course, “arguments” might not be the correct word to use, since he seems to think the word argument only refers to a loud vocal disagreement. As Human Action, I believe, pointed out in the coup thread, he has unique definitions of common words. Or, as John Mace just mentioned–he’s stupid.

[YogSothoth]

I wonder if Shodan will ever get the irony of this topic…

[BrainGlutton]

@YogSosoth

I wonder if Shodan will ever get the irony of this topic…

I’d say that’s a long shot.

[digs]

@Ravenman

I bet you a bajillion dollars that he will eventually see this thread, and will attempt to debate what everyone has said point by point, rather than understand that we are only interested in telling him to go pound sand.

@Frank

Yes, with 17 quotes from 11 threads over the last three years. None of which will be relevant.

@dasmoocher

Or, he’ll claim this is evidence that all have failed and he is Winning!!!..

Okay, a buck to the rapscallion that gets him to jump into this thread in full NOTFOOLED mode.

[dasmoocher]

@digs

Okay, a buck to the rapscallion that gets him to jump into this thread in full NOTFOOLED mode.

Well, let’s bait the hook.

@NotfooledbyW

@dasmoocher

Whether NfbW realizes it or not, this is what he is saying:

Was Barack Obama’s election valid?
Reality: Yes
NfbW: Maybe

Is Barack Obama the validly elected president right now?
Reality: Yes
NfbW: We won’t know until 2016

I write my own stuff. Your conjecture is as unnecessary as it is wrong.

My flight is about to leave the gate. I will tell you again why you are wrong later this evening.

@dasmoocher

You’re going to prove that my conjecture that Barack Obama is the validly elected president of the US is wrong?

Please do.

Or, are you referring to my characterization of your position in what you quoted?

Your position is that a presidential election is not valid unless the term of office is completed. So how can we know if Obama’s election is valid until his term of office is completed?

So,

Was Barack Obama’s election valid?
NfbW: Maybe

True. His term of office is not yet complete.

Is Barack Obama the validly elected president right now?
NfbW: We won’t know until 2016

True. This is the year the next election occurs.

Although technically, the inauguration of the next President will be in 2017. So this bring up other questions. Does the election of the next president mean that the election of previous president is valid? Or, is it not valid until the next, not yet validly elected, president actually takes office? Would a military overthrow in December invalidate two elections?

Tell us, when does an election become valid–end of current term or after the next election? On second thought, please don’t.

[Shodan]

[QUOTE=NotfooledbyW]
My flight is about to leave the gate.
[/QUOTE]
Apparently he saw the nurse approaching with his medication.

Regards,
Shodan

[BrainGlutton]

@Shodan

Has there ever been a poster as dazzlingly dim as this fuckwit?

Clothahump, adaher, brazil84 and FXMastermind, just to start with.

[XT]

@BrainGlutton

Clothahump, adaher, brazil84 and FXMastermind, just to start with.

Honestly, I think only gonzomax comes close to NFBW’s league. Or, hell, in the same universe as NFBW.

[BrainGlutton]

@XT

Honestly, I think only gonzomax comes close to NFBW’s league. Or, hell, in the same universe as NFBW.

Does the Pit have a polling-function?

[Ravenman]

@dasmoocher

Well, let’s bait the hook.

That’s pretty good… but we should start debating whether or not it was a work of masterful genius by Obama to support the invasion of Iraq, but later flip-flopping after being elected in 2010 to then oppose Bush’s diplomatic efforts in August 2003 to peacefully disarm Saddam Hussein.

Because nobody can disagree that Obama supported the war on Iraq, but he did not support diplomacy. Or that Bush supported only invading Iran, which Hillary Clinton voted to allow him to do, but that Bush didn’t support going into Iraq until Tony Blair and Ted Kennedy forced him to. These are all facts and cannot be argued.

[elucidator]

Hell, she even went further than that! As everybody knows, Saddam moved his WMD into Syria, now Clinton and Kerry have arranged a process whereby they can be destroyed, thus erasing the evidence!

Wake up, America! Connect the dot!

[John_Mace]

@XT

Honestly, I think only gonzomax comes close to NFBW’s league. Or, hell, in the same universe as NFBW.

Yeah, MFBW is like gonzomax on speed. At least gonzo would go away after a few stupid posts.

[dasmoocher]

I think if he does enter the thread, we should parody his posting style and logic when replying to him.

NotfooledbyW examples:

NfbW: You should not assume that I wrote what I wrote.

NfbW: I never wrote that.

NfbW: That’s what I wrote but it’s a snippet and out of context.

NfbW: It’s not my fault the rest of the world uses the incorrect definitions of words. Just because a billion people uses the word that way doesn’t make them correct. *I *used a dictionary.

NfbW: You cannot correctly argue against my point because what I believe is correct.

NfbW: You are wrong.

NfbW: You have failed.

And by sure to use mis-formated quotes that don’t necessarily support your position:

(-Hamlet recited many time in plays) To be, or not to be, that is the question—
Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind to suffer
The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune,
Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? <”Cite”

Remember your allotment of commas in any one sentence is limited so be sure to string many clauses or phrases or whatever mumbo jumbo they are called together so that your point is illustrated clearly and can be followed easily and everyone can understand what it is because we want to be clear about what we argue for or against or both.

[Ravenman]

To be honest, fellas, this thread is a little disappointing so far. I feel like I’ve been waiting for the guest of honor at a surprise party to show up, but in reality I’ve been waiting in a darkened room with 25 dudes for nine and a half hours. And I’m not even drunk yet.

[dasmoocher]

@Ravenman

To be honest, fellas, this thread is a little disappointing so far. I feel like I’ve been waiting for the guest of honor at a surprise party to show up, but in reality I’ve been waiting in a darkened room with 25 dudes for nine and a half hours. And I’m not even drunk yet.

There is the chance that he’s composing his tour de force 20-plus posts-in-a-row response that will devastate every person on the board that has ever disagreed with him.

[XT]

@dasmoocher

I think if he does enter the thread, we should parody his posting style and logic when replying to him.

NotfooledbyW examples:

NfbW: You should not assume that I wrote what I wrote.

NfbW: I never wrote that.

NfbW: That’s what I wrote but it’s a snippet and out of context.

NfbW: It’s not my fault the rest of the world uses the incorrect definitions of words. Just because a billion people uses the word that way doesn’t make them correct. *I *used a dictionary.

NfbW: You cannot correctly argue against my point because what I believe is correct.

NfbW: You are wrong.

NfbW: You have failed.

You forgot:

NfbW(parody): You see, <insert posters name who has left the thread in disgust after beating his or her head against NFBW’s stone wall of ignorance and incomprehensibility> agreed with me all along. Clearly I was right and the rest of you just don’t get it. Here, let me show you this wall of text clearly showing how they were with me as far back as 1999…

[QUOTE=Ravenman]
To be honest, fellas, this thread is a little disappointing so far. I feel like I’ve been waiting for the guest of honor at a surprise party to show up, but in reality I’ve been waiting in a darkened room with 25 dudes for nine and a half hours. And I’m not even drunk yet.
[/QUOTE]

Well, it’s a bit like a pack of Megalodon ganging up on a really stupid seal pup after said pup had a run in with some Russian sailors. But give him time…it’s possible he’s even now researching things you said 5 years ago that clearly show you always did agree with him…

[Bryan_Ekers]

@BrainGlutton

Clothahump, adaher, brazil84 and FXMastermind, just to start with.

Maybe we could make teams, keep stats…

Y’know… make a living-in-fantasy football league.

[GIGObuster]

[QUOTE=Shodan]

Has there ever been a poster as dazzlingly dim as this fuckwit?
[/quote]

@BrainGlutton

Clothahump, adaher, brazil84 and FXMastermind, just to start with.

You miss a few sidekicks of the last ones, like **watchwolf49 **and Aji de gallina.

@Bryan_Ekers

Maybe we could make teams, keep stats…

Y’know… make a living-in-fantasy football league.

[QUOTE=The Tick animated series]

Forehead: Hey! Who are you?

Arthur: I’m the sidekick.
*
Forehead*: Ok. Boils. Kick him to the side.
[/QUOTE]