Isn’t that the title of Saddam’s new best seller…?
no wait, that’s out out you devil. (probably loses lots in translation…)l
I meant “COLONIC hyperaction”; I though that’s what all the metamucil jokes were referencing…
OK, if you say so.
Complete and utter bullshit, and even if it weren’t, changing the current regime wouldn’t alter a thing. Whatever warming effects may exist in 2009 will be the product of a fifty- or more-year buildup.
Maybe, maybe not; but again, how would changing the current regime prevent either of these things from happening?
And apparently, piss away a significant proportion of those countries’ net worth in an instant, and render insolvent many of the international companies native to those countries but that do a large amount of their business in dollars. Sorry, don’t see it.
And if there’s a Democrat in the White House, these hypothetical Chechens won’t make this hypothetical deal why, exactly?
I sympathize with your apparent wish to see the back of the Bush/Cheney dynasty, but you do no one who shares your views any favors by posting the ravening, wild-eyed, overblown claims you have here.
But hey, don’t let me stop you if you’ve really got to get this stuff out.
You do know that noone registered to vote in DC can elect a Congresscritter that counts, don’t you?
Geez… what are they teaching the kids in civics class these days?
who said anything about electing…
I just want to knock on a few doors, that’s all…
pullany figures out of your ass that you please, that’s where I get mine.
My point is not that the perceived catastrophic sequellae of global warming are legitmately proximately caused by bush’s policies; merely that the perception raises the pr stakes substantially for his fuck you attitude. Pick whatever level of catastrophe floats your boat.
The United States is fundamentally sound. We survived Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson; we’ll survive George Bush.
The United States is fundamentally sound. We survived Richard Nixon and Lyndon Johnson; we’ll survive George Bush.
Knock yourself out… meanwhile, I’ll be on a tour of Caribean islands selling snowshoes. We’ll do about the same amount of good.
Besides, do Republicans ever even get out of the teens in DC? Go preach to the choir.
Hey, Alaric, had you intended to post this in the BBQ Pit or in IMHO/ A few side issues notwithstanding, I really do not see a debate in this thread.
let me rephrase the query:
-
has the world at large a greater than normal interest in the outcome of the Nov. 06 elections?
-
Is impeachment not essential in order to truncate the career of the elephant runj amok?
-
Will, ought, foreign governments help our opposition as we assisted the Ukrainians, etc.
-
Where is our “bullshit revolution?” (We will dip our finger in cow manure as we exit the polling booth, to signify our heroics. It will, however,not be our forefinger…)
i didn’t say anything about preaching and I thought perhaps their might be a republican senator or two at home…
I’m not so sure we can survive a full term and continue as the society we are accustomed to.
I, for one, was spoiled by growing up in a free country.
as something of a collateral question, what outght our attitude be tpwards fpreogj gpverm,emts cpmtrobitomg tp tje replacement of one party’s rcongressmen by another.
I seem to remember unpleasantnes connected with Johnny Chung, vis-a-vis the presidency, but on the other hand, Israel has no qualms about mobilizing domestic fundraising on one side or the other–I really don’t know how the law or media would regartd an out and out slush fund of the sort we put at the disposal of the sundry democratsofthemonth that bush so loves to exalt.
No, I was lying, it really was to you.
GAH!! Learn to type or take a second to actually look at the words on the screen before you hit “Submit Message.”
by way of example, suppose greenpeace of amnesty Int’ll ran adds in Oct 05 using money collected worldwide to urge wholesale rejection of republicans for the speific purpose of setting the impeachment stage?
What objections, if any, might one raise to the advertising?
I general just lurk in GD, but what the heck; I’ll give this one a shot.
alaricthegoth, chill. Literally, this isn’t the end of the world. Remember the seventies? Me neither, I was born in '83. The books I’ve read say it was a pretty bad time. Endless, hopeless war, soaring gas prices, political impotence. Sound familar? Relax. We’ve survived before and will again. No need to call France to help rid us of another George.
The elephant runj amok: Indian wedding band name!
ok, but I’ll bet you deciphered " foreign governments contributing" anyway…
What specific things did you do before Bush was elected that you can no longer do?
I think the Republican candidates would love for their opponents to receive campaign money from the French.
“Worldwide” = The French
Dat’s why wez 'publicans.