andros, that made me laugh out loud. Thank you.
Actually, Zyada, that’s not something I could hold against DC. I’m not in the least bit violent either (I leave that to my novel characters).
I think DaisyCutter just needs to meet the right man, who will show him what his knees are for.
“Your Honor, the girls in question could not help themselves. Being young school girls, they were quite in prepared for the emotions they were to experience upon seeing the Mr. Paedophile’s penis. The defense aserts its right to claim temporary diminished capacity. If anyone is guilty here, your honor, it is Mr. Paedophile for inciting a riot. Also, your honor, given their ages, I move that these girls charges be moved to juvenile court where the records will be sealed after their 18th birthday, which will be in…July.”
[kreskin]“I see no jury in all of Pennsylvania finding these girls guilty.”[/kreskin]
Sorry, but that will never happen.
Being molested by an ugly woman rapist at gunpoint is preferrable to your perverted scenario.
I was gonna say that a thread in which lissener and Brutus were on the same side of an issue was something of a miracle, and should be enshrined in a temple somewhere.
But then Daisy Cutter showed up and dragged it into the abattoir of ignorance. Oh well. It was nice while it lasted.
Daisy Cutter, we generally welcome people of all sexual persuasions, political beliefs, religious convictions, and nationalities on these message boards. Even if they name themselves after a bomb. :rolleyes:
There’s one set of people we’d rather not have around, though.
Bigots.
And you’re looking like one an awful lot right now. Should you wish to retain your posting privileges here, you will have to revise a few things. F’r instance, terms like “flaming homos” are not accepted in the context you used it. Dumb comparisons, like “gays vs. flashers”, don’t exactly help your case, either.
You have been warned.
Abbatoir of ignorance? More like an ignorance breeding ground. I would love to see the abbatoir that could handle Daisy Cutter’s ignorance.
I like the phrase, though.
Daniel
Well, thank you for your warning.
I’m no bigot. I already stated in a GD thread that gays should obviously have equal rights and all that. I don’t like getting hit on by gays, I don’t see how that is bigoted.
Lissener used the word “faggot” in another thread, but I guess that’s ok since he’s gay.:rolleyes: (double standard ?)
And my gays VS flashers argument does not strike me as bigoted. The point I was trying to make is that people usually don’t have a choice in their sexual preferences. Nobody chooses to become a flasher I’m sure.
But, nobody should worry, I won’t partake in any “gay” threads anymore, because I don’t want to make certain people who want to see me gone (sailor) get their wish.
I’d bet no one chooses to be able to get off on flashing.
The choice to do so, and, in the process, victimize another person, is absolutely a choice, though.
-
Can you back that up?
-
Do you truly not see a difference between being gay (being sexually attracted to one’s own sex) and flashing (choosing to expose oneself to others)?
Sorry, but I’m done with this topic. No more gay/flasher debates for me.
I have more important things to debate, and I don’t want to risk getting banned over something like this.
This is my last post in this thread, so nobody should expect any replies if anybody should ask me something or quote something I said.
Daisy Cutter, (if you are still visiting this thread, that is),
If it had been a woman who had repeatedly made sexual advances towards you, would you still have felt that it would be justifiable to punch her? Or would you found another way to deal with the situation. I think that is where the bigotry comes in.
I’ll take that as a “no,” then, shall I?
Oops, didn’t see your last post, daisy.
Oh well, good riddance.
Well, since some people already think I’m a bigot, I might as well be a liar also. I will make one last post, since people are trying to get in cheap shots, after I already said I was out of this thread.
“I take that as a no”
“good riddance”
I’ve been flashed before by a woman flasher before, it was actually a drunk teenage girl, and I quite enjoyed it when she showed me her genitalia.
I didn’t go and chase her down, or beat her up.
**Exhibitionism is defined as:
Over a period of at least six months, recurrent intense sexual urges and sexually arousing fantasies involving the exposure of one’s genitals to an unsuspecting stranger.
Although exhibitionism is primarily a male characteristic in its “raw form” (that is, as exhibited by “flashers”), it exists in women in more subtle form._ Seductive gesturing, provocative dancing (not necessarily by burlesque queens and go-go girls), and hysterical behavior generally involve some degree of exhibitionistic sexuality._ Accordingly, when one considers these common forms of female exhibitionism, the behavior is much more common among women than men.
Although the flasher may wish to startle and gain a sense of power and importance, much more than arouse sexuality, there is still that element operative in this clearly sexual act._ And although the exhibitionistic woman may want flattery and attention, more than sexual gratification, the activity is still a form of foreplay and may very well lead to more overt sexual activity._ For both sexes the behavior is designed (at least in part) to produce sexual hormone secretions into the bloodstream of the observer and enhance thereby the likelihood of sexual activity and reproduction.
We have strict rules in our society regarding when and where one can be sexually exhibitionistic._ Furthermore, exhibitionism is more acceptable in women than in men._ The principle is well demonstrated by the old observation: If a woman undresses in front of a window, a man in the street looking at her may be charged with being a voyeur (“peeping Tom”)._ In contrast, if a man undresses in front of a window and a woman in the street looks at him, he may be charged with exhibitionism (indecent exposure)._ These differences in social attitude notwithstanding, exhibitionism serves survival value in that it provides visual stimuli that result in the kinds of hormonal secretions that may result in procreation.**
That was taken from this link:IPT Journal - "A Theory About the Variety of Human Sexual Behavior"
And that was definitely my last post in this thread, even if others try to egg me on, or try to come with cheap shots after I’m gone.
Goodbye.
Fucking drama queen.
There’s no justice like angry mob justice
Daisy, go suck lisseners dick already.
two people insulted with one phrase, gotta love it.
:smack: lissener, it’s not that I disagree with the point you’re trying to make here, but by using it on someone who won’t possibly get the irony, you’re making the situation worse.
Nicely put.