May not be safe for work!
These people are technically clothed - I think. Feel free to cut and paste the link.
I’m just going to pop into this thread with a warning:
WARNING: IF YOU WANT TO GET ANY SLEEP AT ALL TONIGHT, DO NOT LOOK AT THE OP’S LINK. The sheer ugliness will make you afraid . . . very afraid.
Tripler
I’m serious. I’m going to introduce my eyes to Mr. Melon Baller
[QUOTE=Tripler]
I’m going to introduce my eyes to Mr. Melon Baller
[/QUOTE]
Sorry. It’s a dull night. Sometimes google is NOT my friend.
As bad as #1 is, #3 is hot!
Jeez, note to self “LISTEN to Tripler’s advise”.
Think I should get one for grandma?
If this link is not work safe, then facism has won. Quite funny, but how do I know what size is me? I really need something to wear to graduation.
[QUOTE=Mouse_Maven]
Sorry. It’s a dull night. Sometimes google is NOT my friend.
[/QUOTE]
What were you trying to find that brought up this, rude suits? Dude suits?
Ah. Nude sluts.
Happens all the time.
[QUOTE=Rysdad]
What were you trying to find that brought up this, rude suits? Dude suits?
[/QUOTE]
I was looking for a vibrator and pillows. One click lead to another. . .
Good thing I’ve got the house to myself tonight. 
The Internet, she is a beautiful thing, no?
[QUOTE=Mouse_Maven]
I was looking for a vibrator and pillows. One click lead to another. . .
Good thing I’ve got the house to myself tonight.
[/QUOTE]
Your posts get more and more interesting as the night progresses… lol.
The woman’s kneecaps in picture #8 are freaky.
[QUOTE=Mouse_Maven]
I was looking for a vibrator and pillows. One click lead to another. . .
Good thing I’ve got the house to myself tonight.
[/QUOTE]
House to yourself? Ah, hence the vibrator. 
Huh. Faddish.
[QUOTE=Mouse_Maven]
These people are technically clothed - I think.
[/QUOTE]
Actually, there’s a fair amount of Photoshop involved in these pictures, though I can’t say for certain what exactly was done to them.
[QUOTE=Cervaise]
Actually, there’s a fair amount of Photoshop involved in these pictures, though I can’t say for certain what exactly was done to them.
[/QUOTE]
It’s an art project, not a clothing line. It’s possible that this was done entirely in photoshop, and that such clothes exist only digitally. On the other hand, it’s possible that someone took pictures of those people and printed them on fabric; no photoshop required.
Now, let’s be completely fair to Mouse Maven. She was obviously looking up what to clothe her naked mice in so they could look like her nude mice. (She actually explained the difference in a recent thread.)
[QUOTE=FaerieBeth]
The woman’s kneecaps in picture #8 are freaky.
[/QUOTE]
Forget the knee caps-- there’s something…“off” about the placement of that guy’s dick.
And I agree that #3 is a smoker.
#5 ain’t too bad either. And #9 could be pretty hot if she worked on her smile. And wore regular clothes.
[QUOTE=Mbossa]
#5 ain’t too bad either. And #9 could be pretty hot if she worked on her smile. And wore regular clothes.
[/QUOTE]
And did something about the pubic hair.
[QUOTE=Cervaise]
Actually, there’s a fair amount of Photoshop involved in these pictures, though I can’t say for certain what exactly was done to them.
[/QUOTE]
I agree. ‘Obvious photoshoppery’ is one of the most widely-abused and annoying phrases in describing internet images, but still, I think it applies here - the shorts in image number 6, for example, just look like they were cut out and slapped on top - and in any case, if the image depicted a real garment, it would only work when viewed from the angle in the photo.