Adding, I’d wager she could even have put some kind of makeup on the latex to make it match her flesh tone, and powder so it wouldn’t be shiny. I’m guessing that she’s wearing liquid latex pasties.
Who would have guessed that Keira Knightley is more tan than Scarlett Johansson? 
But why? She has a nipple showing in at least one photo that appeared of her when she was on the cover of Esquire (should I sell this to DotC?)*. I don’t think either young lady is all that shy.
*It was very well camoflauged… I didn’t even notice it when it came out. Only on reading a subsequent issue where some prison inmate complained that the issue was banned, so I went back and looked. There it was. No biggie. Literally.
Won’t comment on your comments - but this:
From the linked article:
"Let’s face it, Min says: Women do like to see sexy men – just not with all their clothes off.
“Men just aren’t viewed as sex objects in the same way that women are,” Min says. “Women don’t think about men being naked in the same way that men think about women.” In fact, she says, at her magazine’s offices, when photos come in of a male star with no shirt on, "We say, ‘Gross! Put some clothes on!’ "
this just made me go whaaaaat?!
(and I’m a woman)
Well, I for one DO like pictures of beautiful and sexy half- or all-naked male movie stars. Do ‘women’ not really like this; am I all alone? I doubt it…
Manflesh! mmmmmh…
I see no problem with this magazine cover. Nope. None whatsoever.
[Seinfeld rules]
Female body = good naked
Male body = bad naked
[/SR]
ShibbOleth maybe the magazine’s editor wanted to stop short of showing a nipple after the fuss over Janet Jackson’s exposure, or for whatever other reason they felt was a good one?