But does it give her the right to file frivolous lawsuits and crazy-assed motions? The answer, in case you didn’t know, is yes. Unless the judge tells you to stop, then the answer is no. Contempt of court, here we come!
You owe me another cup of coffee.
If deporting is out, can’t we ship her back, postage due?
Oh, I can hear it now:
“How dare you twy to bwibe me, you miscweant!”
I don’t think a contempt charge is technically a criminal charge, so no, but I could be wrong, and that would be awesome.
She’d find a way to rationalize it. She’s so twisted you could use her mind for a corkscrew.
OTOH, I’d pay money to read such a rationalization. About US$0.03.
Actually, as an attorney you don’t have the right to file frivolous lawsuits. When you sign a pleading you are certififying to the Court that
That is why the judge is looking to impose sanctions on her. For what it’s worth, I skimmed her motion through last night, and I don’t think that this will help matter at all.
Some judges are stricter on Rule 11 than others and either way, it takes a lot to get sanctions imposed.
Most states have a similar rule in place.
I daresay that this string of filings by Oily can only be a classic, textbook case of how to poison the well of judical forbearance.
what is your damage, KG? DJ stand you up for your playdate? next time you fancy an arbitrary shit, aim for your mouth.
Well, this’ll ensure this thread doesn’t get moved to MPSIMS.
too late to edit - KG, I apologize if I’ve overreacted. I normally enjoy your posts. Shit wherever you like.
with all this talk of oily tits and taints, and you think this would be the straw?
Thanks for the link- that was a good read!
John Carter of Mars is still a regular poster- maybe he can update us.
Yes. Tits and taints get mentioned all the time over in MPSIMS. Dopers telling Dopers to shit in their own mouths, not so much.
must be a thin line
In fairness, she just told him to aim for the mouth.
The Persuaders think so.
On the other hand, I’m thinking, “Is It Possible To Shit In Your Own Mouth” would be a fine addition to MPSIMS.
Wow, her reality-defying fuckwittery has been entertaining us for months. Better late than never yes?
Though, as typical with Democrats, we can’t agree on what to call her consistently. I have nothing but respect and admiration for the OP, but I’m far too fond of “Oily Titz” to give it up. Everyone knows who everyone else means though, so it doesn’t matter. Welcome to the Oily Titz/Oily Taint fan club! (not to mention its offshoot, the Judge Clay Land fan club).
Dentist/Sorta Lawyer/Real Estate Agent/Total Loonball/Mail-Order Bride (not established, but I like the notion)/Judge pisser-offer…she’s phenomenal!
Man, I can’t wait to see the movie. Who’s going to play her? Angelina Jolie is a decent actress who’s good with accents, but doesn’t do blowzy blond very well. Meryl Streep could ace the accent, but she’s too old now (though Lola might help). Kate Winslet? She’s a great actress. She played a charismatic and persuasive murderer in Heavenly Creatures, but her character wasn’t totally batshit insane (which Titz is, of course). Too bad Abbie Cornish is too young. But wait, Abbie could play the young Titz.
Pity. It was a nice retort.
I suppose… it’s just that, y’know, I’m watching Stargate Universe and the new season of House MD on UK TV within days of their US broadcast, and I didn’t even get a heads-up about this.
And this is more entertaining, sadly.