I think this bears repeating because you’ve probably almost 100% nailed it.
And because s/he is undoubtedly a troll.
She wanted total control of my life (and my brother and sister’s lives). We were only supposed to exist in order cater to her whims. My aunt, my grandmother, my father and many other relatives had to fight numerous battles with her over our safety and education.
That would have been the logical title for the relationship they had with you. They were not biologically related to you, but were your legal guardians who cared for you. That should be enough for anyone who cares about the child. Why is it necessary to create fake familial relationships?
I was adopted, and while I’ve never met her, I’d like to express my gratitude to my biological mother for not having me suctioned out, or doing the infamous “gypsy nose-pinch” that we’ve all heard so much about.
…but who does not value post-birth infants as human beings, apparently.
Oh, well, that’s a perfectly rational reason for that, then. :dubious:
Now I’m curious to know, at what point in post-birth development does your worldview bestow the title of “human being” upon the object of your scrutiny? First 24 hours is out, obviously, but how many days, weeks, months, or years does the kid have to make it through before it is safe from the prospect of ZPGZealot being okay with its, ummm, disposal?
No, maybe the sky is pink and people such as you who are not abhorred by murdering babies is to be celibrated, but thank you for showing us your colors.
Yeah, makes me feel kinda lucky, too.
Look, I didn’t say that I agree with any of this nuttiness. As far as I can tell, at this stage of the conversation:
-
**ZPG **is the flappiest flapdoodle who ever trolled her way through troll town.
-
Infanticide in ancient Greece and Rome is as batshit a practice as ever was invented. (BTW, those dudes were also into rampant misogyny, wanton violence, gladiatorial games, slavery, imperialism and animal abuse. I’m not cool with everything they got up to.)
-
I’ve read stuff by Peter Singer that made sense to me on other topics, but this one will be a hard sell, to put it mildly. I hope he has some damned good arguments.
I’m just saying that other perspectives than mine exist. **ZPG **has lost me at this point, though. And thanks to everyone for the reality checks.
Too late for edit:
That good enough for you? Or do you still want to accuse me of condoning baby-murdering? If so, bring cites.
In cultures that openly practice infanticide it’s most frequently done immediately after birth, before any further resources have been wasted on the infant. I think that is very sound practice. In situations where a woman has been forced to give birth it becomes more problematic because she may not have easy access to the infant. In the end my answer is this: I give a traumatized woman forced to live as a human incubator for months a rather wide leeway on her subsequent behavior toward the source of all that pain.
She equates adoption to non-kin with slavery.
Whether you’re playing at being controversial for the sake of attention or whether you truly believe the delusional ideas you’re peddling, I’m sure you can thank your mother for some of the crazy, but the bulk of it is all you.
How good for your peace of mind, then, that your preference that adopters be required to announce their status to all and sundry is NOT the law of the land. :dubious:
Please don’t give us reading assignments. If you know of something that the person your link is about has said or written that is germane to the subject at hand, feel free to spill it.
Providing the link for contextual evaluation is appropriate, and appreciated, but the way you dropped it into the thread is neither.
I must remember this!!
You know what? I’m mildly pissed off at this point (not at you in particular, though, just in general). So I’ll just say what is on my mind:
Do you know what I’ve enjoyed in this thread? ZPG’s posts, and trying to understand her perspective. Sometimes a fruit loop is just a fruit loop, but how the fuck am I supposed to know without investigating the matter? Also, it might be a fascinating and interesting fruit loop. I can look at things that that I don’t understand or agree with, and try to see the other side. I don’t think that’s a particularly crazy way of going about things.
Some posters in this thread have, at times, displayed the same attitude. But as the for the rest of you, pelting tomatoes? How about you knock it off with that shit? It’s fucking distracting. Some of us are trying to have a conversation here. And what the hell are trying to achieve? You’re sure not fighting ignorance.
Thank you so much for yet another non-answer.
If the baby is not viable without coercing adults to care for it why isn’t infanticide as moral as a late term abortion? It is an interesting concept.
*The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. But that’s the way to bet.
– some smart guy*
How about you not be a retard and don’t put threads where you want to “have a conversation” and “fight ignorance” in The Pit. Retard.