Omnibus Stupid MFers in the news thread (Part 2)

But definitely not at a Uniqlo.

Lenny Bruce was arrested for using the word schmuck. (The link goes to Wikipedia.)

The charge this time was that the comedian had used the word “schmuck”, an insulting Yiddish word that was also considered a term for “penis”.

I thought that was “putz”.

Yes, that too, although I don’t think that’s considered quite as obscene as “schmuck”.

Was it a Jewish contingent that brought this up to those opposing Bruce, or was the use of those words an excuse to shut him down by a group of people that otherwise wouldn’t give Jews the time of day?

Bruce was arrested again in 1961 in Philadelphia for drug possession, and again in Los Angeles two years later. The latter arrest took place in then-unincorporated West Hollywood, and the arresting officer was a young deputy named Sherman Block, who later became county sheriff. The charge this time was that the comedian had used the word “schmuck”, an insulting Yiddish word that was also considered a term for “penis”. The Hollywood charges were later dismissed.

Sherman Block (July 19, 1924 – October 28, 1998) was the 29th Sheriff of Los Angeles County, California from January 1982 until his death.

Biography
Block was born to a Jewish family and grew up in Chicago.

In 1962, Block arrested comedian Lenny Bruce for obscenity, namely using the term “schmuck” during a comedy routine. Block had been sent to one of Bruce’s performances by his superiors because he spoke Yiddish and thus could follow Bruce’s act, which was peppered with the language.

532 years later, it would appear the Italian press still hasn’t gotten the memo that Columbus didn’t land in India after all.

For those of us not yet fluent in Italian, what does it say?

Throwing the headline into Google Translate:

(Wowwwwww.)

The smaller text says, “Here are the real reasons for the choice of Walz. Unlike Obama, Kamala does not break through among American ‘wasps’, so now she is taking cover.”

Pretty sure I’ve been on a date w her.

Doesn’t make a lot of sense, considering that Obama also picked a white man for Veep.

iSTM that you still always have to have at least one nominally Christian straight white guy on any US major-party presidential ticket.

I feel like everyone is missing the point that they portrayed her wearing a war bonnet as if she were the other kind of Indian.

Here’s an English language rundown of the headdress fiasco and the editor’s lame explanation.

From your link:

Editor-in-chief Tommaso Cerno explained the cover and said there was no confusion over Kamala Harris’ origin. Kamala Harris was described with the headgear because ‘redskins’ are the symbol par excellence of all America’s minorities who are “galvanized” by her candidacy.

“Redskins”? Wow. That’s like saying The Sopranos is just a celebration of Italian culture. I wonder what his response would be if her were asked to list those minorities. Let me guess.

  • Sp…
  • Go…
  • Ja…
  • Ch…

Oh, yeah. Let’s not leave out

*Wo…

And who besides him is portraying the vice-president as a Native American?

By the way, is anyone pointing out the main thing driving the bigoted attacks against Ms. Harris is that not only are her parents minorities, but her mother earned a PhD and was an accomplished scientist, while her father earned a PhD and is a professor emeritus at Stanford?

It’s unclear to me if the Italian paper actually used “redskin” or if that’s a translation of an Italian word into English.

No, I got that point, too.

Yeah, I got it without even trying to put any of it into a translator, with that picture. Some really fucked up and confused racism on full display there.

Now I want me some pemmican curry.

I’m going to guess that is not one of Italy’s more prestigious news outlets.

Furthermore, who besides him thinks that Native Americans are in any way the most visible or iconic example of historically oppressed minority groups in America? Pretty sure that would be Black Americans, tbh.

Yeah, that explanation just reeks of “after-the-fact rationalization of original stupid mistake”. What really happened IMHO was that the editor heard “controversy about US politician being Indian”, thought of American Indians (probably with a dim recollection of the Elizabeth Warren “Pocahontas” kerfuffle from several years ago), and went with the feather-headdress caricature.

Then was too embarrassed to admit “uh, yeah, I didn’t realize that Harris is actually an India-type Indian-American, not a Native-American-type American Indian”, so made up this “symbol par excellence” bullshit to handwave it away.