‘No deer. Arse too high. Run too fast.’
Some guys will do anything for a buck.
D’oh!
But not the question of whether a conviction for this Class D felony depends on the animal being living as opposed to deceased. Kentucky law, section 525.137 does not address the issue.
Note: the law (look it up if you must) does make an exception for "accepted veterinary (or) animal husbandry* practices), which raises even more questions.
*remembering the classic Tom Lehrer line about someone who majored in animal husbandry “until they caught him at it one day”.
Bambi was male.
No shit.
You’ve never heard of the Curse of the Bambino?
And the article didn’t specify the deer’s sex either.
It’s to allow for artificial insemination and medical exams of animals which sometimes involve inserting an appendage into one or another orifice of an animal.
Back when I worked on a dairy farm, a cheerful guy with a cooler full of test tubes and a box full of very long gloves would come by once a week to make sure the calves (and therefore the milk) kept flowing. He had a healthy sense of humor about his job.
I have read quite a few articles from Wired over the years. Can’t recall any that felt edgy or provocative. Maybe a little irreverent. It’s usually just tech reporting.
Graham Platner is “accidentally” being a Nazi again.
I think there was a Rick and Morty episode about that
Your purity testing will lead us directly to the outcome you claim to fear.
At no point was Graham Platner “accidentally” being a Nazi, again, in that exchange unless you think Hitler’s support of stop signs at intersections means that you support fascism if you like controlled intersections too.
“No Nazi tattoos” seems like a perfectly reasonable level of “purity” to maintain.
Right, he probably just tripped and fell onto a tattoo needle that drew a totenkopf on his chest and made it stay there for 18 years.
Right, that’s the point. It wasn’t ever accidental.
To be fair, the comment he shared was against the attack on Iran, parodying the government post in style but anti sending Americans to war in the Middle East. That’s certainly a mainstream Democratic position.
The problem is the source was from a “despicable” account, prompting the question of why and how he got that post from that source.
Am I the only one who finds the answer to the question, “how did The Boy with the Nazi Tattoo end up with a groyper in his feed” to be completely obvious?
Oh, whoops! So clumsy. Platner “accidentally” listened to a Neo Nazi podcast, became a huge fan, sat down for an interview with the host, and told him he was a “huge fan” while on the show.
Oopsie! So silly!
Yeah, I said that a little facetiously. What I meant was it wasn’t the opinion that was troublesome, it was the source.
Man, I hate it when that happens. It could happen to anybody.