nee Terr, fwiw.
Carrotopia?
Tomatoronto?
Potatopeka?
Onionebraska?
Cukenosha?
Cabbageorgia?
Radishwash?
Spinacho?
Garlicorice?
Peasign? [no, not him…]
Lettucephalopod?
Broc-E-coli?
[OK stopping now]
:D:D:D
*throws rotten tomatoes and cabbages at John DiFool.
:smack: Yes. Sock, not troll.
Interestingly, Okie joined the same day Terr was banned. Hid in plain sight for 2 years! Any new, rabidly pro-conservative posters joined today?
If Okrahoma was in fact Terr that sorta tears down the theory that he was a paid Russian agent provocatuer.
Though he certainly could have simply been reading RT.com and posting however that inspired him out of shear cussedness.
Interestingly, he joined but didn’t post for 13 months.
Per what he has posted on the board, Terr is an Israeli living in the US who grew up in Soviet Russia in the 1960s and 1970s.
But if anyone was paying for his posts, they sure got crap for their money.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned from Law & Order, that means they were in prison all that time.
enthusiastic applause, followed by a lengthy raspberry
Now it’s just a matter of time until the long tentacles of the law catch up with octopus.
So what you’re saying is, you guys still let him stay around for about year since he exhibited such an amazing feat of self-control? 
Just kidding, btw. I have no idea how difficult or easy it is to identify a sock. I think I participated in one effort, many years ago, but other than that… nothing.
On what basis, you delusional fool?
I recall one guy (Don’t Fight the Hypothetical) who got caught asking, in a Pit thread, why his socks had been banned. Yes, plural.
Not at all a troll, but I just wanted to say that, given the level of evidentiary challenges offered by him, if I wanted to commit a crime spree, I would get Frothingay Pipps elected DA and then go to town, crimin’ it up, knowing he would be all
“What? What crime spree? Where’s the evidence?”
“Here, sir.”
“That’s not evidence. That’s just an email saying ‘let’s rob the bank’.”
“Well, it was sent two hours before the bank was robbed.”
“So? Probably a joker.”
“The man whose email account it is, was seen robbing the bank. The other person robbing the bank? The recipient of the email.”
“Yeah? Was he seen writing the email? The other guy… any evidence he read it?”
“Uhhh… no on the first. Email was marked as ‘read’ when we searched his computer.”
“Obviously a coincidence. I see no evidence of pre-meditation here. How do we even know the bank was robbed?”
I think we first need to define the term “bank”.
They keep money on the riverside?
FTR, the guy’s name is Fotheringay-Phipps. Although maybe you were butchering it on purpose to make some point.
Which, when translated, means: Beat me up and take my lunch money.