Omnibus Trolls R Us Thread

It’s gotten to be the first thing I check when it’s a clickbait-type title.

I’d like to nominate octopus for troll of the year award.
He’s dumb as a bag of wet mice on his best day. If you haven’t experienced him, you probably will soon enough.

Yep, I wanted to be the first to project his ban timeline. I say he’s a casualty of 2017.

Mofo is as useless as the Pope’s family jewels.

In a similar vein, I nominate Hurricane Ditka.

In one of his recent threads he wanted to know why Dopers considered themselves smart.

Calico Jack is still here. Will he make it to the 25th? He’s working hard on getting out before then.

Well, folks are not only feeding him, someone is building a special trough just for him sate himself in.

Talk is cheap, sorry that you’re so sensitive you feel the need to cry for bannings for entirely ambiguous reasons like a petulant child ‘telling on’ his classmate.

If you’re looking for a ‘safe space’ or whatnot, the web is certainly the wrong place for you. The web is the cyberspace equivalent of the Wild, Wild West. And you’re obviously no Mad Max.

Looks like there are a handful of people I’d consider ‘trolls’ who seem to want to turn this forum into their own little ‘safe space’.

Definitely isn’t the majority here, but say something this little crew if you will digress with or offends them for God knows what reason, and immediately the cries of “troll” or “I hope the mods ban you after Xmas” start without any posts showing forum violations.

Must suck being that hypersensitive, you’d barely be able to leave the house or accept that there’s a diverse world that exists out there beyond some sheltered cloister of the internet.

As a matter of fact, Calico Jack, you’re right. But I ain’t yet sunk to horse stealin’. Oh, I’ve salted claims, yeah. And I’ve sold whiskey to Injuns. And once a man in Walla Walla come at me with a gun and I killed him. I can’t think of one commandment I ain’t shattered regular. I never did fancy my mother and father, let alone respect 'em or honor 'em. And I have coveted my neighbor’s wife - whenever I had a neighbor and he had a wife, mm, mmm! And I gamble and I cheat at cards, but there’s one thing I do not do. I ain’t never gulled a pardner. The one sacred thing, even to low scuff like me, is a man’s pardner.

You might note that there are always ongoing disagreements among posters here of various political and ideological views, including those who are consistently conservative and tend to run against the grain of the majority here – some were mentioned here, and I can think of a number of others. I don’t know of any established member here who is offended by a differing point of view, and in fact I find that thoughtfully expressed differences of opinion are constructive because they sometimes force you to think harder about your argument or gather additional facts to support it. Personally, I welcome such posters, and I’m sure most others do as well.

This is not the problem that the comments about you are addressing. They are addressing the fact that you are a useless fuckwit and a waste of space who makes no such contribution to discussions. There’s a significant difference between objecting to a contrary opinion and objecting to the disruptive intrusion of a gibbering moron. If you were smarter you could understand this difference. Plus, you are a pompous ass and a prime exemplar of the Dunning-Kruger effect. I admit that I base this only on the limited amount of your magnificent oeuvre that I’ve glanced at, so perhaps you’ve said something useful somewhere that I haven’t seen, although I seriously doubt it.

I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.

I shot the sheriff.

Then, why did they put you in Folsom prison? Did you carry his dead body to California?

One of the first posts I made here was arguing that evolution is logically similar to the creation and development of human technologies, which can be empirically observed.

…then immediately some poster showed up demanding that I be banned, I guess for ‘denying evolution’ when I wasn’t denying evolution, merely stating that it doesn’t conflict with the notion of creation by some higher intelligence.

So not only was he calling for censorship but was straight up lying about me and claiming I was arguing that “evolution isn’t real”. Just a militant Humanist trying to silence someone who doesn’t tow his philosophical line.

Wow, what a wonderful vocabulary you have…

Because I insulted Bronies… geez…

Cite for the bolded statement, please.

I think the better question is, why are you and some others so insecure in your manhood that a sarcastic thread I posted is causing you so much annoyance?

http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=19872109&postcount=3

^— this fellow named Monty who’s tagline says “science advisory board”, shows up to stalk me in a complete OT thread.

I’m guessing he’s just another militant Humanist who probably doesn’t know much about evolution or the Scientific Method, but apparently made up his mind I’m an “evolution denier” and has gone off on a crusade to have me banned, even when his reading comprehension is poor if he thought I was “denying evolution”.

Basically suggesting a higher intelligence is behind evolution goes against his humanist statement of belief, so he is intolerant to those he deems a heretic, of course:

Not sure why a militant Humanist should be on the ‘science advisory board’ myself, but what the hell…

Not to mention this dolt had no response when it was pointed out to him that there are more ‘slaves’ employed in corporate sweatshop labor today than prior to the abolition of slavery in the US; he’s probably having a little conniption right now.

Here’s a hint. If you don’t want to be seen as a troll, don’t act like the Trolls-Royce of trolling.

Dear C.J.,
What’s your hangup with “manhood”? You’ve got a thing about it.

Why are you so offended that people on the internet don’t think Bronies are ‘manly’, I doubt many do on or offline, get real.

I am remarkably secure in my womanhood; I just find liars irritating. I’d still a cite for someone “immediately” showing up in *response *to your intelligent design thread calling for your banning.

What you have posted was from yesterday, and was in response to the totality of your idiocy. In other words, that cite is no good, and doesn’t show anything like what you have claimed.