So you prefer, “fucking imbecile”? I’m fine with that. Have you checked with your client?
He’s established himself as a right-wing apologist, spreader of fake news and disinformed opinions. He lacks critical thinking skills and probably has poor penmanship.
You only defend him for partisan reasons.
How much do you want to bet that Ramira’s FB page is a cesspool of anti-Clinton and anti-Obama hysteria, lies and Republican propaganda?
shrug I don’t know if I’d call adaher a troll, as such - just relentlessly partisan. Actually, it’s always been my assumption that he works for the Republican part in some capacity or other.
I would very much doubt it. But she’s being pretty tedious here.
The thing about the “safe space” allegation is that it’s always used in situations where it’s clear that someone is being attacked. And that’s the literal opposite of a “safe space.” In a safe space, you are just kicked out.
I honestly think that Ramira is just confused, perhaps due to the language barrier. The nuances of posts eludes her. But, rather than realize this and play it more safe, she goes in guns blazing, using whatever buzzwords seem to fit. Even when she is informed that she misunderstood, she doubles down.
We can easily see how adaher was trolling. He brought up an old nothing story, and sensationalized it almost to the point of parody. His post was clearly about riling people up.
That said, given his normal behavior, I actually think he’s just easily duped by right-wing trolling, and then releases his outrage here. Because normally he seems more reasonable. It’s only when he’s posting something that’s got him riled up that he seems to troll.
I’m rather sure that the story he brought up is making the rounds in conservative outrage spheres. (The source he linked sure seemed to be one.) I personally appreciate the notification, since I don’t like to hang out in those places (as I find it hard to not get angry when deluged in that stuff[li]). And it’s easy to refute. I just wish he wouldn’t fall for it.[/li]
[SUP]And I’m sure that’s entirely unexpected.[/SUP]
Lol, no.
The funny thing is that your Trollfinder General Morgenstern admitted on the Giraffe Boards to trolling openly for lulz to get a rise out of you morons. The post was c@p in the thread where Morgy called Helena and others viciously misogynistic names. Yet your anger is reserved for a conservative poster and a Spanish poster who is posting in a completely consistent manner.
You are a moron. Differences of opinion are not trolling.
I have no client.
And no problem with ‘fucking imbecile’ - I have no love for adaher’s views or his politics.
et voila the silly snowflake reaction…
I have zero partisan affiliate with adaher and as the history here shows in any reply to him it is most likely I am criticizing stupid things he claims about the various things european or the similar than defending any thing he said.
Indeed I have about zero partisan political sympathy for him at all.
I simply find the butt hurting snow flaking use of the word troll here substantially by persons on the farther end of the left here for any right wing poster very boring and annoying. And so this time have wasted some of the time saying so.
The waste of time is acknowledged since of course none of you will change in any way.
says the idiot who tried to invent the idiotic and tedious quarry thing and was rebuked on his tedious use of it so many times.
so impressed.
Oh yes, please do bet.
It shows you are an idiot who can not differentiate between the mere critic of a stupid, boring abused usage of the word troll and a partisan of the american right.
But you are too stupid to make the difference.
the record of posting here shows I was only complementary of Obama in general, dislike Trump and have shown I think very little sympathy for the republican party and their being duped by Trump and the russians…
but obviously you are stupid and butt hurt and run to this idiotic accusation.
yes a relentless partisan, very boring.
that is not the same as a troll.
That is a stupid assertion. A cursory look through her posting history dispels it. She may be aggressive to the point of insufferable at times, but a right-wing partisan hack she is not.
And Adaher isn’t a troll. He’s an easily excitable, uninformed, boring tool who doubles, triples, fripples and so on down to the nth degree, until he gets tired (also known as “reasonable”).
I think we’ve found the next SMDB moderator - it’s hard to find people dumb enough to put up with that asshole.
As someone who does think this thread and its application of the term “troll” has drifted too far from the original intent/meaning of both, I must say that your whining here about the correct definition and usage of “troll” is rather tedious. How 'bout you go shout at 4chan-ers that their “memes” aren’t adhering to Richard Dawkins original definition instead?
Ok, so you’re not a right winger.
But this post and others show that you’re a raving asshole douchebag.
Yeah, of course. It’s idiotic and makes me a moron to assume that when someone with whom I am unfamiliar jumps in to defend a hysterically hypocritical hyper-partisan like Adaher, that they’re of the same ilk. :rolleyes:
No offense here, but you’re the one who has whined about this thread and the meaning or application of troll. This thread seems to be working just fine, and most people seem quite happy speculating here.
It’s kind of like assuming the ACLU is a fascist organization because they supported free speech rights for Nazis in Skokie. It may make you wonder at first, but a small amount of investigation will show your initial assumption to be in error. Perhaps that small amount of investigation would have been worth it before a personal accusation.
But hey, it’s the Pit. What’cha gonna do?
Call everyone ‘Fucking Assholes’ and move on? 