[QUOTE=Sunrazor]
In the interest of trying to understand life after rape, and because the last thing I want to do is hurt someone with my own ignorance, I have a question.
Do all rapes violate equally? Is there any difference, from the victim’s viewpoint, between a makeout session turned into coerced sex and a sudden, violent attack? I’m thinking that, just as “no means no,” thus “rape is rape.” True, or are there varying degrees of violation?
Also, has there ever been a serious attempt to study long-term effects of rape and, even more importantly, society’s reaction to it?
[/QUOTE]
I think there are a wide range of reactions, and certainly as many “recovery tracks” as there are victims. Some people say stranger-rape is less damaging than, say, incest (because of the emotional baggage that comes with it), but that’s not necessarily the case. I’ve known some individuals with histories that should, truly, have landed them in the looney bin for the rest of their days but they are well adjusted, productive survivors. I’ve known some individuals with a history of, say, an unwanted grope by a stranger on a subway to be devastated to the point of suicidal ideation.
In my opinion, everything hinges on immediate intervention and “after-care”, along with the victim’s personality, history, and identity prior to the sexual assault.
There are some studies on the long-term effects of rape/sexual abuse/sexual assault - plenty, in fact. I’ll dig up some cites for you later. As is true with most trauma, there’s a wide variety of reactions, healing processes and recovery periods, depending on the victim.
Society’s reaction is interesting. I’m sure someone has poked at it, from a sociological or psychological angle, but I haven’t really come across anything that would qualify as in-depth. I’m sure it’s out there.