If Pat Buchanan is now defending a white man who shot dead dozens of other white men as somehow defending whiteness under siege, then he’s done. He has embraced violence against the inoffensive, thus putting himself outside the civilized, & he’s not even a good
Do you really think he sounds like he is defending the man? (bolding mine)
Though Breivik is being called insane, that is the wrong word.
Breivik is evil – a cold-blooded, calculating killer – though a deluded man of some intelligence, who in his 1,500-page manifesto reveals a knowledge of the history, culture and politics of Europe.
There is no bigger pig than Buchanan.
This is nothing that PB hasn’t been saying for years.
True. PB is the archetype of a kind of conservative who prides himself on being hard-headed and realistic, willing to face the ugly truths without flinching, something sadly lacking amongst idealistic and daffy lefties. Real problem with that thinking is it tends to believe that if something is ugly, it must be true, if anyone is happy, its only because they are ill-informed, and the PB of the world rush to correct.
Somebody once said Pat Buchanan is only rational 15% of the time. It might have been Hunter Thompson, so 15% is probably an over-estimation.
Yes. Bolding mine:
As for a climactic conflict between a once-Christian West and an Islamic world that is growing in numbers and advancing inexorably into Europe for the third time in 14 centuries, on this one,
Breivik may be right.
No, Pat, he cannot be, and
you ain’t helpin’ none here.
Buchanan is partially right about this - to the extent that importing an underclass is a bad idea, especially where they don’t identify with the culture. That is obvious from the terrible problems in Paris.
Europe faces today an authentic and historic crisis.
With her native-born populations aging, shrinking and dying, Europe’s nations have not discovered how to maintain their prosperity without immigrants. Yet the immigrants who have come – from the Caribbean, Africa, the Middle East, South Asia – have been slow to learn the language and have failed to attain the educational and occupational levels of Europeans. And the welfare states of Europe are breaking under the burden.
That is seen here.
What the trends suggests is happening that for men, the immigrant culture that has emerged in Europe is worse even than the culture they brought with them from Turkey, Algeria etc. Women instead are less oppressed, and work more than their mothers.
Comparing Second generation male immigrant relative employment rates with the first generation immigrants:
Comparing Second generation female immigrant relative employment rates with the first generation immigrants:
Employment rates (the figure in the parenthesis compared immigrants to the native born):
Native Men: 79.0%
First generation non-European immigrant Men: 67.8% (-14%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Men: 60.0% (-24%)
Native women: 66.5%
First generation non-European immigrant Women: 43.3% (-35%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Women: 53.5% (-20%)
Native Men: 66.3%
First generation non-European immigrant Men: 61.6% (-7%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Men: 53.0% (-20%)
Native Women: 58.9%
First generation non-European immigrant Women: 37.6% (-36%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Women: 42.4% (-28%)
Native Men: 75.3%
First generation non-European immigrant Men: 68.5% (-9%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Men: 53.9% (-28%)
Native women: 65.8%
First generation non-European immigrant Women: 42.5% (-35%)
Second generation non-European immigrant Women: 43.8% (-33%)
The answer is to be more selective in recruiting from populations with a higher level of state dependency. Otherwise, Milton Friedman’s comment about the welfare state and open borders being incompatible will be proven correct.
Which would ruin an otherwise perfect record.
We’ve done it before. Looking back now, it was always a
You’re talking about the US with people mainly from Europe when there was no real welfare system.
That should make adjustment/assimilation
easier, not harder.
Just like he doesn’t defend Hitler in his deranged version of history where the British started WW2. The man is an utter fucktard.
So basically, the [Nazi] ideology suggests that 950 Jews are controlling the Norwegian government, a government which is known to be the most anti-Zionist of all European countries…!? Let’s not forget, 1000 Jews are controlling Ireland etc. These NS claims are absolutely ridiculous and counter-productive. Being a Norwegian myself, I know that these claims are completely false.
I think this may be right.
July 27, 2011, 1:58am
Well done. You trolled through the 1500-page rantings of a deranged individual and found a paragraph that contained the truth, all in the defense of a man who’s a proven liar and racist.
The sad reality is that Buchanan helps mainstream anti-Muslim intolerance. A regular MSNBC contributor and frequent guest on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Buchanan once invoked the Nazis’ attempt to march in Skokie, Illinois as an argument against the Islamic Center proposal in New York
I hate Illinois Nazis
Pat, Glenn, in the pig, NOW!
Don’t forget that he’s a fan of girls’ beach volleyball.
Hitler ate sugar. Want some?
Yes. Bolding mine:
Can you point to the specific passages where he is defending him?
[QUOTE=BrainGlutton;14067979No, Pat, he cannot be, and
you ain’t helpin’ none here.[/QUOTE]
Oh, BrainGlutton is going to take time off from posting OPs like Linda Richmond and divine the future. Oh, boy! You know, I think Buchanan has a much better grasp on world events and the sweep of history than you do. And at least Buchanan has the sense to say something MAY happen in the future. You say it cannot happen. How do you conclude that the notion of the Christian West and Islam clashing spectacularly CANNOT happen? Or are you just talking out of your ass, as usual?
I’ve read some of his books. He don’t. He is wrong about everything that he seems to regard as important, including how civilizations decline and fall.
Buchannan is the brains in the tea baggers. he is their hero. What he was saying will play well in baggerland.