From pldennison:
Let me see if I have this straight,Ken.I’ll number the points so you can follow them.You are:
1.Threatening me publicly
2.With the name of a United States Congressman(for whom I didnt vote,incidentally,and I know damn well where Lake County is,as I lived there most of my life)
3.To try to have me charged with “sexual harrassment”
4.In regards to a person who I’ve never met and who works neither with me nor for me
5.Following a posting on an Internet message board
6.In a forum called “The BBQ Pit,” designed expressly for posters to insult each other
7.To which the aforementioned came of her own volition and began rampantly insulting total strangers
8.And after you yourself(whoops,your ‘persona’)spent several weeks slinging personal insults willy-nilly at several other posters
9.And recently made accusations of false identity among three posters
10.Claiming to have accumulated personal information about them without their knowledge.
Does that about sum it up? You do what you have to do,Ken.Whatever will make you feel better about yourself.But don’t threaten me,because if you ever try a stunt like that,I’ll countersue you for harrassment,stalking,and wrongful prosecution.And I strongly suggest you not try to pull public officeholders into personal situations you create for yourself in an attempt to strongarm people.If you want to take it up with me in e-mail,be my guest.
(any typos are mine-orangecakes)
What is this?
If pldennison has a problem, why is he not posting this himself?
Are his hands broken?
Ocakes, I read the post about phil in MPSIMS, and I have to ask: What do you hope to achieve here?
I don’t get it. Phil stops posting because, well, he wants to take a break from the board, but still he posts by proxy?
What’s up with that? Am I missing something here?
>^,^<
KITTEN
Fluff yer hair Beula, I’s feelin frisky - M.S.
Wow - a new pathetic low for Phil.
Hell is Other People.
It seems perfectly reasonable to me. PLD wanted to take a break from the boards. A poster who had made a specific legal threat against him is planning to leave the boards soon. In all likelihood, PL’s return will be after Phaedrus’s departure. But PL, having been contacted by Orangecakes, remembered the legal threat and that he had not responded. Rather than posting himself and having to start his break over, he asked OC to convey the message.
Unusual, perhaps, but not particularly weird.
Livin’ on Tums, vitamin E and Rogaine
Would someone be kind enough to give me the adridged version?
I dont really want to wade through pages and pages of Great Debates, so can someone give me the scoop…whats all this about a legal threat??
This is turning into the shittyist(sp?) soap-opera I ever heard of!
With magic, you can turn a frog into a prince. With science, you can turn a frog into a Ph.D, and you still have the frog you started with.
“Shittiest.”
According to the dictionary at least.
I went, I read, I feel dirty.
Tell me phil isnt actually worried about that crap!
I honestly had no clue what a nut-bar Phaedrus was…<shudder>
oh - my - God.
I always thought Phaedrus was loopy, but this … Kelli, don’t settle for the adbridged version. You’ve GOT to see his post on the link jab1 supplied.
Words absolutely fail me.
I bet he wears a tin foil yarmulke to keep out the Venusians’ whispered suggestions of self-abuse.
But – but – but, he was such a nice, polite young man. Very quiet, a good neighbor.
I just can’t understand why he would go and – oh. Right.
I have tried before to read his ramblings, and they make me dizzy. I am not kidding, they actually make me dizzy…I cant follow the circular reasoning.
Sorry, its over my head.
A lot of good humor on this string, all things considered, I wish I had checked in while it was “live”…
“I find it interesting that a lady who can see “beauty” in a pile of garbage and thinks animals have emotions cannot see any good in me.”
Sounds like something John Hinkley might say.
“Susy (KGB) was banned because she and I use the same computer at times, given what the administration had to go on I would have done the same thing.”
This is telling passage - I will not imply anything from it, just point it out. Of course it is hearsay as it was reported by one side of a brain to the other. AND I would add - GET TO WORK, GET OFF the board.
“This money is not easy for me to come up with, yet, being a man of my word I will do it. In the ups and downs of my life I have done everything from picking vegetables with migrant Mexican farm workers to working on HUGE projects. The largest I ever worked on was for 250 million dollars (I didn’t get the contract) for the Super K expansion (K-Mart).”
SO, did you get he contract OR NOT, I mean either you did or you didn’t…
“The largest sale I was awarded was 2.2 million in 1992. There have been times when I made $10,000.00 on a phone call with another company of mine, but that is not my situation today.”
And you don’t have $1000? Whaddup homey?
“What will probably happen is that I will have to postpone the Africa trip and cancel Europe this summer as well.”
And while you’re at it DAHLINK, seel the diamonts, fuuurz und da Hispano-Suiza?? Puh-leeze
And in another rant he tells someone, that people only read CS Lewis 'cause they are a “seeker” OR they have a religious friend give it to them. THis is typical of a western legalistic minset run amok. If he can posit such absurdities and draw “provable” conclusions from that shred of evidence, what can he do with the subtleties of philosophy or religion. Oh, we all know by now. I will not risk prosecution for intelligence here.
I will relate a similar experience from ANOTHER BBS. About 10 years ago, I was on a BBS, in the politics board, the debate raged about the PRI, Mexico’s ruling national party. An American (handle “Tattoos” - if you call 3 tiny little bitch tatts tattoos, sorry I am biased, I have over 40 hours of Irezumi, but I digress), who claimed to grow up in Mexico, and a great lover of the campesinos (the common folk) lauded the PRI, said everybody loved them (this is quite different than saying one person likes them, which is his right), and claimed that there was no insurrection in Chiapas or Guatemala.
At the time I was working with survivors of torture from where? Yep, Guatemala and Chiaps. Whichever side you’re one, there is no doubt the shit was flying down there in the early nineties. Unfortunately the American media was not covering it much. This “Tattoos” knew what was up as well as I did, from watching the virtual Vietnam on Galavision everynight. I also had reports from the Nation, reports I transcribed from Spanish TV, in Spanish, with translations into English, and various other sources, plus at least one mainstream American article. THis was the Internet as we know it and not so much was available online. Because the rest of the board was bitchy ranting idiots, everybody thought I was picking on poor little “Tattoos”. As no one had heard of the struggle down there it was obviously true. The discourse degraded, naturally, and became personal.
After ad hominen attacks about personal trainers (I was at the time - nice gig, but too much psychotherapy involved) I challenged him to a bench press contest. Silly i know that was the intention. He declined, but I met him soon after, by chance.
1 month later I was banned from the board, he had claimed he had slept with me, I had small testicles, and that was proof that I had been selling steroids on the board. How did he accomplish that? He was sleeping with the SYSOP/moderator (who actually went by “GOD”).
I suppose the details aren’t pathetic as funny, I see this latest as more of the same, including the inevitable - TRUMP CARD. In may case banishment (yawn) in this casemore severe, poor legal logic coupled with claims to people in high places - i.e. I’m so lame I have to trump TRUTH WITH POWER.
Good riddance. He is not gone. He is not the person in the picture. He is listening.
Pity him, have compassion, and forget him. Disengagement is the only compassionate thing you can do.
If he does come back, let’s all agree to ignore and warn the newbies.
I have everyones personal information that has ever been on this or any other board and I will use this against you all to bring you to ruin.
Or maybe I’m just as full of shit as the OP. lol! suing, slander, blah blah blah.
I’ll say it again, you people have WAY TOO MUCH TIME ON YOUR HANDS.
is anyone on here over 12?
BTW- Who exactly are the “REGULARS” I always hear about? Somone on another board said not to piss KelliBelli off (I have no idea why). But according to her profile she has only been a member here since July. As a matter of fact most of the “so-called regulars” appear to have been members for less then a year. WTF??? This board has been here longer then that I assume. Is there anyone here that has actually been here for over a year? or did these “so-called regulars” (a lot of whom seem like silly little children) run off the real regulars with their childish ways?
This board needs some class. No wonder Cecil hardly ever posts on this board. I’m surprised he even wants to be associated with it.
Actually…this board has NOT been here for longer than a year. (I think…one of the old AOL people want to correct me?)
It grew out of the AOL boards. As for what makes a reg? Hell, whenever people recognize you, I guess. Hell if I know. Quit yer whining…ALL of us are over 12, asshole.
Blockhead, this board was created in March of last year. Before that it was on AOL where many of us were regulars for many years. So no, the oldest person on THIS board can’t have been here over a year.
–
Teeming Millions: http://fathom.org/teemingmillions
“Meat flaps, yellow!” - DrainBead, naked co-ed Twister chat
O p a l C a t
www.opalcat.com
Blockhead,
There is a reason for the BBQ Pit. It’s a place to flame when the other boards are not appropriate.
Why the quote “is anyone on here over 12?” Then “This board needs some class.”??? Again, this is the BBQ Pit, if the other topics on the other boards are too juvenile for you then you should seek out other avenues by which to enter into an on line community. Otherwise lighten up dude.
<rolling eyes>