Yep, you managed to work in the two biggest dumbass argument tactics we see on these boards. “What you’re really saying is…” and “actually, you’re the REAL (bigot, criminal, whatever).” These are the twin mating calls of the slope-skulled paste-eating shitbird.
Oh, and I forgot, having any kind of sincere opinion is “religious”, and having any kind of standards is “bigotry”. I can see how this would be threatening to a feckless dipshit like you.
Wasn’t a zinger so much as an announcement that you are incoherent and imagining up a bunch of weird stuff about what I’m saying so I don’t see what further communication will do.
Oh, that’s being fair, is it? We got some nutjob denying that “apostates will never be my therapist” is bigotry, but let’s be fair and note I didn’t apologize for a mispeaking.
Since the response that this JAQing fuckwit deserves cannot be stated in the thread that he’s currently polluting with his willful ignorance, I think his comments need to be consistently referred here.
And might I suggest, for those heroically patient enough to respond in that thread - which is important, because lurkers might be reading it - that there’s the option of just linking all his comments to here and responding here.
I haven’t read the original thread, so this is just a random stranger reacting to a few lines of text. It appears to me someone is illustrating a divide between Orthodox and secular Jews in a therapeutic setting. Considering how religious differences can potentially set off wars, it seems wise to recognize potential conflict in a setting where conflict wouldn’t do either the therapist or patient any good. I don’t see any example of religious bigotry.
That’s a lot of effort just to say you’ve run out of things to say.
You should delete your post and run away again, like when I caught you out pushing your opinion as fact in that COVID thread. Easier for you, and much more entertaining for everyone else.
Its also worth noting that at each and every single posting this fuckstick called Saytwo has made, they have all been refuted, every single point this idiot has made or claimed or hinted at, or inferred, or slyly purported in a roundabout way.
You can look at every one of those links and immediately after find a full refutation.
When you examine the persistance of this poster it is difficult to come up with any conclusion that this individual fits the Troll word very well. Not a Troll in the conventional sense, not at all, an individual with an agenda - attempting to drag others into their world.
It makes me think of scammers who send out material that is roundly condemned by the vast majority of rational folk, but one in every thousand viewers will be intrgued by what at first seem to be credible alternative points of view, and they will be drawn in - for most of us Saytwo is just an irritating noise, but I worry for the few who might be dragged into their world, and groomed little by little into a very different world.
Dragged into a world of Conspiracy theories and into a more sinister agenda.
In this I give @Saytwo no space whatsoever and make no allowances, the position this poster holds is not one of honest debate or iqnuiry, it has other motives and may well be dangerous to the well being of others - there is nothing benign about this poster.
Even without speculating on motivation, the topic he’s so concerned to spread disinformation about means the effect is certainly not benign.
Perhaps I should have made clear, by the way - I was not linking all the posts here because I think anyone needs go and read them, eveyone one of his “points” has been refuted numerous times. I just wanted to make sure that if any lurker is reading that other thread, there is not just a refutation that abides by the etiquette of that subforum, but also a link at the bottom of every one of his posts back to this Pit thread.
Silly Fig. I didn’t say the religious and secular Jews were at war. You do understand they have their differences, don’t you? Like a devout Christian and a layperson?
Yes they have differences. And anyone is free to make religious decisions based on those differences, percieved or real. That doesn’t give anyone a get out of jail card for bigotry.
If you think of it as a difference between somebody who is a devout follower of a religion compared to somebody who is not a devout follower of a religion, then it makes much more sense. The particular religion is not important, but understanding how a religion can be central to a person’s life is.
Am I bigoted for not wanting a therapist who talks to me about my relationship with god?