You’re deflecting. You’ve been trying that for a long time and it failed. You were not given a Pit thread for inaccurately guessing what a person believes. The purpose of this thread is that you make false claims about what a person has said, that you are libelous. All of your other blather is a distraction from something that you’ve now admitted you’ve done.
If somehow you can move on from that and somehow not do it again, and also keep insults to the BBQ Pit, maybe there’s hope for you? (At this point I doubt it, but I’m an optimist.)
He seems to be a case study in “perception equals reality”. He believes it, so therefore it is true. Not just true, but so true that he doesn’t have to provide evidence because it’s The Truth.
Add me. I don’t even have a dog in the whole ‘guilty or not’ argument. I’m just frustrated by the moral cowardice on display here. Steophan is digging an epic hole.
Hello, everyone. I don’t often post in pit threads, but for some reason I feel compelled to quickly point out that Steophan appears to be a lying liar who lies.
Didn’t realize it was a vote. I’m pulling the “Steophan is too stupid even to be lying” lever, with a side of “gaslighting doesn’t mean demanding evidence for claims.”
Wow. This thread has gotten a lot of replies since I checked it last.
I just was coming in here to point out that I don’t at all believe Steophan’s routine in ATMB. He couldn’t have been posting here for this long and not understand what the rules mean by “insulting a poster.” This idea that a fact cannot be an insult is just arguing for sport—taking whatever position is convenient at the time. I don’t for a moment believe he believes what he’s saying. I think that’s also what you guy are seeing here with some of his other arguments.
I also note that the language “gives you a sad” is clearly designed to be insulting. It’s a common trend among conservative “arguers” who want to put down their opponents. Best I can describe it is that it uses a type of baby talk to imply the person in question is being a baby.
It’s also a pretty dumb argument in general, since it in no way argues against iiandyiiii’s position, and in no way actually establishes any inconsistencies in his claimed system of morality.
I almost posted this in ATMB, but thought this thread was more appropriate for calling out bullshit.
And he knows this, because he’s alleged people were guilty who were acquitted. Heck, I’m pretty sure it was he who brought up OJ Simpson, a well known case of someone acquitted who was guilty.