I was going to wait until I got some more data on this, but since the poll aspect of the OP doesn’t seem to be going anywhere, I’ll explain. For a bunch of caveats to what I am about to say, see the end of this post.
In couples there is always a power struggle (to some degree), in the sense that on many occasions the two parties disagree on a course of action for the couple, and a decision has to be made, so it comes down to who gets what they want.
Many years ago, the “weapons” men brought to this power struggle were physical intimidation and financial superiority.
Over the centuries, women have learned to counter-balance these “weapons” by developing their own “psychological weapons”. (e.g. Girl: Looks upset. Guy: “What have I done wrong?”. Girl: “Nothing”)
Thus, both parties had developed methods of getting what they wanted.
Now, in our modern times, men are taught that physical intimidation and abuse are out of the question. In addition, women now have jobs and therefore financial independence.
Therefore, the “weapons” that men brought to the couple’s power struggle disappeared.
However, society does not frown so much on the “psychological weapons” women use in relationships, so they have kept them.
As a result, there is today, in modern couples, a power imbalance, and women have more ways of getting what they want than men do.
The reason I asked about the socio-economic class is because I wanted to see whether this situation exists in all classes, or is confined to the college-educated upper-middle class guys who have Political Correctness and sensitivity drilled into them much more than lower classes.
CAVEATS: The above is a gross overgeneralization and oversimplification of the situation. I don’t think the above applies to all women, all men and all couples. It’s just an idea that I think roughly fits what I have observed in people around me. Also, I don’t think men should go back to using physical intimidation and I don’t think women should stop working.
Anyway, I’m curious to see if other people think the above has any speck of truth in it, or whether it’s comlete bullshit.