If you have no interest in playing video games, is this at least in part due to not liking the noise they make?
- Yes
- No
- I suppose I could turn the noise off, but I have the impression that it’s part of the point
- Other
0 voters
If you have no interest in playing video games, is this at least in part due to not liking the noise they make?
0 voters
Legend of Zelda players: Which of these games do you prefer?
0 voters
Final Fantasy players: Which of these games do you prefer?
0 voters
You would enjoy going to:
0 voters
Mario players: Which Mario game do you prefer?
0 voters
Jobs:
0 voters
You’re leaving the house for at least 45 minutes. Which of the following do you trust to allow to operate in your absence?
0 voters
Were you aware that, of all common appliances, studies have shown that dishwashers cause the most fires?
0 voters
Which of these categories do you think is the most-frequently-abducted category?
0 voters
(Follow-up poll in the blurred spoiler section)
I was frequently told, as a kid, that adult men are actually, in fact, the most-frequently-abducted category. Do you believe that statistic to actually be true? (I personally find it a bit dubious and perhaps hinging on what exactly the definition of ‘abduction’ is.)
0 voters
0 voters
0 voters
0 voters
Do you find beets, chard, spinach, kale, turnip greens to be “bitter”?
0 voters
If you were to win a tax-free lottery jackpot of $323,490 right now, would it induce you to retire and quit your job?
0 voters
How much additional money would cause you to decide to retire right now?
0 voters
Which would you consider to be greater?
0 voters
Whether or not it would cause you to quit your job, would getting a tax-free lottery jackpot of $323,490 be a life-changing amount of money for you and/or get rid of a lot of knots in your shoulders caused by having a whole lot less than that amount?
0 voters
Do you like cucumbers and would you describe them as having a strong taste or smell?
0 voters
“Spam”: as referring to junk email/calls/texts:
0 voters
Legal hypothetical:
You are the best federal defense attorney in America, able to get almost all of your clients acquitted of most charges. One day, the phone rings. An oddly-familiar voice is on the other end of the line. Someone is greasily begging for legal representation. “The feds have indicted me on charges of keeping classified documents in my luxury resort in Florida…so unfair…what about Hillary’s emails…no other lawyers are willing to represent me…”
You tell him, “You have a reputation for stiffing your lawyers, not following their advice, trying to get them to do illegal stuff, and also have a yuuuge horde of fanatical followers known for violence, so I have yuuuge qualms about helping you, to put it mildly.” After half an hour of haggling, you manage to get him to agree to a flat-fee payment up front - no retainer, only flat-fee - and also that you reserve the right to drop him as a client should he ever refuse to follow your advice, or try to get you to do anything illegal or unethical. “The flat-fee needs to be yuuuuge,” you tell him. After some more haggling, he agrees that you will get paid $4.5 million no matter the outcome, but there will also be a $4.5 million yuuuge additional bonus if you get him acquitted, as well, since 45 is a number of special significance for him. He agrees, signs the contract, wires the initial yuuuge $4.5 million payment over, and it confirms and clears.
Do you accept him as your client and defend him to the best of your ability in federal court?
0 voters