President Obama eats his steak medium-well!

To continue being terribly politically incorrect, that’s why the steak was medium well rather than well done. :slight_smile:

You will both burn in hell for all eternity.

Or maybe you’ll just, you know, win the Nobel prize or something. :wink:

I’m actually wholly disturbed by it. We go so far as a society to get rid of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. And then people just come up with other reasons to think of themselves as better than everyone else.

It seems it is human nature to belittle others based on trivialities. And that sickens me.

Yeah. I mean, maybe when we eradicate ‘foodism’ (that’s an extremely valid word I just invented; you got a problem with that, you languicist??:wink: ), I guess people will think of something else to feel superior about. :smack:

Yeah, foodists, what’s the problem with medium well? Whenever anyone asks me how I want my steak, something that only occurs about once every five years but that is often enough to keep me drooling, I reply “Joan of Arc is alive and medium well.”

[SIZE=“1”]However her favorite song is not “Light My Fire.”[/SIZE]

Nobody’s advocating laws that prevent you heathens from getting married or voting. It’s just joking around, grow a thicker skin willya?

It could be what you’re used to, growing up. My parents are from Eastern Europe and on the few times when we had steak at home growing up, it was always on the well-done side of medium. Not that we used those terms, it was just “raw” or “done”. I never knew that steaks could be made any other way until I was much older.

In general I agree with this. People are perfectly capable of deciding what they like. On the other hand, I have met a few people that wont eat anything less than medium well. They also don’t think very highly of steak. I often wonder if they would change their mind if they tried it less cooked. A quality rare to medium rare steak is right up my list as food of the gods.

I’ve always just et it straight from the butchers. I’m uncertain if freezing would do anything to the buggers we’re generally concerned about with raw beef. Since I don’t cook the burgers enough to kill all the little beasties anyway, I don’t think eating the raw meat is really any more dangerous.

As I mentioned in a related thread, you aren’t a real foodie unless you gnaw fresh beef off a living cow, with all the authentic humors and juices flowing.

I don’t mind if some of you gawk at my own steak preferences, just stay the hell away from my plate.

As for Obama, I can’t see giving the man the Nobel Peace Prize if he’s eating well-broiled meat. Next thing you know, he’ll be roasting puppies and saying the Pledge of Allegiance.

But if he puts ketchup on them, they’ll take his Peace Prize away! :stuck_out_tongue:

I’m more upset Obama wastes the tax payers money by just sitting there waiting for his medium-well stake to be ready. He should just eat it raw and get back to work. Better yet, he should be hooked to an IV that gives him nutrients so he never has to leave the war room, not even to go to the bathroom. Only socialists take a break to eat.

Under your proposal, he would need not only an IV, but a catheter as well.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that idea. . .:wink:

He could just take a dump in the Press Secretary’s hand, that’s what he’s there for.