Why, no, I was not aware, because a quick review of my posts shows that in fact I capitalized a grand total of three words in all my posts to you, one of which was the acronym “IME” and the other of which was the word “you”, used twice, which I assume you construe as using it – oh noes! – “repeatedly”. Therefore, your assertion that I have yelled, shrieked, or screamed at you is patently ridiculous, at least around here. But obviously things are different on your planet, and I am ignorant of your customs and ways.
Disingenuous nonsense, Jodi. Why, there are three capitalized words in this post alone, one of them even bolded.
Quoted for truth.
How could i have missed them? i apologize. i can only plead that i did not attend the archy and mehetabel academy of correspondence. i will try to do better but i can’t make any promises. i hope apostrophes are okay if not i retract the last. ditto periods
So now we’ve gone from delusional me completely making shit up to the actual examples of yelling (one of which, of course, is bolded as well, so you can’t claim the caps were merely emphasis) just not counting, rather than not existing in any possible way. I guess “more than once” is now not “repeated”, either. How did I guess you would instantly move the goalposts?
Unless Ensign Edison is trolling or stupid, neither of which I think is likely, he’s working from an erroneous premise (courtesy of ProtectMarriage, the lying bastards):
Barack and Michelle Obama personally feel that a marriage is supposed to be between a man and a woman, for life. However, they do not believe that this translates into a divine mandate to restrict others from their legal rights, as do the “Christians” of Yes on 8.
Obama is on record as saying that GBLT Americans deserve equal civil rights, and access to an institution (civil union, I think) with equal rights to marriage.
Correct, but not “marriage” itself.
Allow me to further elucidate, to a degree it astonishes me to find necessary:
-
Yes, “two” is technically “repeatedly,” in that the word or action has been repeated, albeit once, but “two times” is not what is generally understood by the word “repeatedly.” If you doubt this, feel free to ask around, keeping in mind that mileage does vary by planet.
-
Capping an occasional word is an accepted alternative to bolding or italicizing when giving emphasis to that single word – as opposed to all-capping phrases, sentences, or posts, which is generally understood to be yelling. It is not actually that hard of most people to distinguish between the two. Again, feel free to ask around, though again MVBP.
-
I’m at a loss to know what you’re talking about by saying “one of which, of course, is bolded as well,” because I know you cannot possibly be talking about the fact that I capitalized “I” when using the first-person singular – a word that is always capitalized in that use, and I mean always, unless you’re ee cummings or don marquis and let’s face it, you’re not, both of them being dead. Since I must explain – must I explain? Really? – I bolded that word because capping it adds no emphasis, because it’s already capped.
-
I certainly can “claim” that the word YOU was all-capped for emphasis, because that is in fact the reason it was all-capped. Full stop. If and when I begin yelling at you – or screaming or shrieking – believe me, you’ll know. This is another point on which you should feel free to ask around.
Review this latest exchange on basic netiquette and then tell me what Option (C) is, because at this point I’m thinking the answer has to be (A) or (B).
I have just sent the following letter to my senators and congresswoman.
Regarding marriage:
It has become clear since the federal Defense of Marriage Act was passed over a decade ago that marriage, both as a word and as an institution, is in large part a religious matter. I would be grateful if the government would articulate why it is in the business of licensing marriage, and separately why it grants special rights and privileges to those who have a government-sanctioned marriage. As a gay Californian, my state has voted that I not be allowed these rights and privileges. I understand that I am not a member of a protected class, and that discrimination against me is legal. I question, however, the wisdom of assigning special rights and privileges to people based ultimately on a religious sacrament not available equally to all members of the citizenry.
In short, please remedy the injustice. Either grant gays the right to marry, or mandate civil unions rather than marriages for all, or end the government’s interest in marriages altogether.
I’m sure others could have expressed this better, and I hereby invite you all to try: wherever you live, if you’re in the U.S., please write your representatives and tell them how you feel about this nonsense.
I want to print this out on postcards and mail one to every house with a yes on 8 sign.
Ensign Edison your entry into this thread, a response to:
was:
I’m curious to know how the conversation is likely to have progressed had you merely received a response of
Are you trying to lead into the point that “Yes” on 8 voters should not be fucked with a splintered stick? Are you trying to lead into the point that if they should, then some Obama voters should be fucked with a splintered stick? Is it your point that in order to not deserve fucking with a splintered stick, one must have both voted “No” on 8, but also have voted only for a presidential candidate who has, as part of his or her platform, publicly advocated that same-sex marriages must be given equal validity with heterosexual marriage under U.S. law (and, if unable to find one, sat out the presidential election portion of the ballot)?
I’m also curious to know if such a candidate existed in this year’s election, and if so, whether you cast your vote for that candidate.
If I’m reading the thread correctly, you are the first one who brought the word “compromise” into the discussion (a search for the word confirms that it was in post 84), and you seem to have done so in a way that devalues a vote for Obama.
I also noted the following:
President-elect Obama made very clear that his fundamental belief about American public policy is that social issues must be decided in a way that can be reconciled with the basic American ideal of fair play and equal rights for all interested parties. He made it clear that one’s personal religious beliefs are not properly the sole basis for such decision-making. If one’s religious beliefs happen to coincide with the outcome of the decision-making process, it must be just that–a coincidence; they cannot be the raison d’etre for the decision.
Using this model, one’s beliefs about God’s preference on any issue are compartmentalized and irrelevant, and it is not bigotry to vote for someone who holds such beliefs.
*NB to all and sundry: I am operating under an assumption that there is no currently-registered Doper with the username Hypothetical Response. Should I be mistaken, please accept my apologies for the Board violation.
This was a travesty.
Sorry about that, Captain Lance Murdoch. I did my best.
Right this second, apparently the Prop has still not been called, as there are enough uncounted ballots to tip it. That being said. there is a candlelight vigil going on RIGHT NOW around the Sacramento capital building (and in SF too, I guess).
They are also drawing “Yes on 8” folks.
Wish I could be there.
All over West Hollywood/hollywood/beverly hills as well. They’re still out there, thousands of my brothers and sisters. I wish I had known so I could be there.
I’m fucking proud of all you guys.
Thanks, liberty3701.
Anytime, HD. You too, Indistinguishable. I’m a go beat my head against the wall for awhile. I used to live in a really conservative part of CA, so I shouldn’t be *that *surprised, but still…
Hey guys, the Mormons want to make sure that we’re all cool with this:
No hard feelings, right? Respect and love all around, right?
Death threats are still frowned upon, right? I mean, both in the Pit and in real life?
The mormans can kiss my ass.
But then again that would probably make them gay and we don’t want them.
Wow, Ninja. That is possibly the dumbest quote I’ve ever heard from anybody.